ReviewHNO2008
[Cell-based strategies for salivary gland regeneration].
Review in HNO, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Xerostomia as a side effect of radiotherapy or due to Sjögren's disease leads to considerable impairment of the quality of life of the affected patients. Preventive treatment approaches such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, surgical transfer of a submandibular gland to a site outside the radiation field or administration of amifostin during radiation treatment are not yet completely established in clinical practice and are not applicable for all patients. Symptomatic treatment with pilocarpin or synthetic saliva leads to an improvement of the symptoms only in some patients, and in the case of pilocarpin significant systemic anticholinergic side-effects might occur. Because large numbers of patients are affected and current treatment options are not satisfactory, it is essential to develop new treatment options. In parallel with the in vitro production of functional salivary gland constructs by means of tissue engineering techniques, attempts are currently under way to experimentally restore salivary gland function by genetic treatment approaches such as transfection of the affected salivary glands with aquaporins or pro-angiogenic factors. In addition, the in vivo application of stem cells is under investigation. In the present paper, we discuss the clinical and radiobiological background of xerostomia and highlight possible innovative future treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.