Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18209776›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie2008

Canadian credentialing guidelines for colonoscopy.

J Romagnuolo, R Enns, T Ponich, J Springer, D Armstrong, A N Barkun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on safety and quality indicators in endoscopy.Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie · 2012
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient-identified quality indicators for colonoscopy services.Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation of colonoscopy skills - how well are we doing?Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie · 2011
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Is the 'driving test' a robust quality indicator of colonoscopy performance?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2010
    Article
  14. Report from the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Board.Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie · 2009
    Article
  15. The inpatient colonoscopy: a worthwhile endeavour.Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie · 2008
    Article
  16. Canadian credentialing guidelines for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie · 2008
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J RomagnuoloDivision of Gastronenterrology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
R Enns
T Ponich
J Springer
D Armstrong
A N Barkun

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CanadaClinical CompetenceColonoscopyCredentialingGastroenterologyGuidelines as TopicHumansPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID18209776
PMCPMC2659115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.