Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18209669›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2008

Noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure near the end of life.

Tasnim Sinuff, Deborah J Cook, Sean P Keenan, Karen E A Burns, Neill K J Adhikari, Graeme M Rocker, Sangeeta Mehta, Robert Kacmarek, Kevin Eva, Nicholas S Hill

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02114944 (Treatment of Dyspnea in Do-not-intubate), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02114944 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Treatment of Dyspnea in Do-not-intubate (DNI) Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorTufts Medical CenterRan2014 to 2023Enrolled400ConditionsAcute Respiratory Failure, Acute on Chronic Respiratory Failure, DyspneaArmsNIV, CPAP, Standard oxygen, HFNC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Palliative care for chronic illness: driving change.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Tasnim SinuffDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. taz.sinuff@sunnybrook.ca
Deborah J Cook
Sean P Keenan
Karen E A Burns
Neill K J Adhikari
Graeme M Rocker
Sangeeta Mehta
Robert Kacmarek
Kevin Eva
Nicholas S Hill
Tufts Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleFor patients with acute respiratory failure who have declined intubation and resuscitation or have chosen comfort measures only, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may help them achieve important health or personal goals, or merely prolong the dying process.

objectiveTo determine clinicians' attitudes to and stated use of NIV for these patients.

methodsWe developed an instrument to assess the attitudes of intensivists, pulmonologists, and respiratory therapists (RTs) toward the use of NIV for patients with acute respiratory failure near or at the end of life. After assessing its psychometric properties, we mailed the survey to these clinicians at 18 Canadian and two U.S. hospitals. We analyzed factors associated with stated use of NIV for do-not-resuscitate and comfort-measures-only patients.

resultsOverall, 104 of 183 (57%) physicians and 290 of 473 (61%) RTs participated. Two thirds of physicians include NIV during life support discussions with do-not-resuscitate patients at least sometimes, and 87% of RTs stated that NIV should be included in such discussions. For patients choosing comfort measures only, almost half of physicians reported including NIV as an option in their discussions at least sometimes, while fewer than half of RTs stated that these discussions should be conducted. Most (>80%) physicians use NIV and most (>80%) RTs are asked to initiate NIV for do-not-resuscitate patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Fewer clinicians report using NIV for do-not-resuscitate patients with underlying malignancy (59% of physicians, 69% of RTs) or for patients choosing comfort measures only (40% of physicians, 51% of RTs; p < .001).

conclusionsFor patients with do-not-resuscitate orders, many physicians use NIV, and many RTs are asked to initiate NIV, most often to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Further study is needed on the goals of NIV near the end of life, whether these goals are understood by all stakeholders, and how well they are achieved in practice.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPractice Patterns, Physicians'Terminal CareHumansRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID18209669
OpenAlexW1975983829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.