Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18208957›Full record

Trial reportCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2008

Telehomecare for patients with multiple chronic illnesses: Pilot study.

Clare Liddy, Joanne J Dusseault, Simone Dahrouge, William Hogg, Jacques Lemelin, Jennie Humbert, Jennie Humber

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Empirical Foundations of Telemedicine Interventions in Primary Care.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. A systematic review of clinician and staff views on the acceptability of incorporating remote monitoring technology into primary care.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Referral and management options for patients with chronic kidney disease: perspectives of patients, generalists and specialists.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Internet-based support for cardiovascular disease management.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2011
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clare LiddyRiverside Family Health Team in Ottawa, Ont. cliddy@scohs.on.ca
Joanne J Dusseault
Simone Dahrouge
William Hogg
Jacques Lemelin
Jennie Humbert
Jennie Humber

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the feasibility and efficacy of integrating home health monitoring into a primary care setting.

designA mixed method was used for this pilot study. It included in-depth interviews, focus groups, and surveys.

settingA semirural family health network in eastern Ontario comprising 8 physicians and 5 nurses caring for approximately 10 000 patients.

participantsPurposeful sample of 22 patients chosen from the experimental group of 120 patients 50 years old or older in a larger randomized controlled trial (N = 240). These patients had chronic illnesses and were identified as being at risk based on objective criteria and physician assessment.

interventionsBetween November 2004 and March 2006, 3 nurse practitioners and a pharmacist installed telehomecare units with 1 or more peripheral devices (eg, blood-pressure monitor, weight scale, glucometer) in patients' homes. The nurse practitioners incorporated individualized instructions for using the unit into each patient's care plan. Patients used the units every morning for collecting data, entering values into the system either manually or directly through supplied peripherals. The information was transferred to a secure server and was then uploaded to a secure Web-based application that allowed care providers to access and review it from any location with Internet access. The devices were monitored in the office on weekdays by the nurse practitioners.

main outcome measuresAcceptance and use of the units, patients' and care providers' satisfaction with the system, and patients' demographic and health characteristics.

resultsAll 22 patients, 12 men and 10 women with an average age of 73 years (range 60 to 88 years), agreed to participate. Most were retired, and a few were receiving community services. Common diagnoses included hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. All patients had blood pressure monitors installed, 11 had wired weight scales,5 had glucometers, and 5 had pulse oximeters. The units were in place for 9 to 339 days. Three patients asked to have the systems removed early because they did not use them or found them inconvenient. The other patients and their informal caregivers found the technology user-friendly and useful. Health care providers were satisfied with the technology and found the equipment useful. They thought it might reduce the number of office visits patients made and help track long-term trends.

conclusionThese pilot results demonstrate that telehomecare monitoring in a collaborative care community family practice is feasible and well used, and might improve access to and quality of care.

Indexed as

InternetAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID18208957
PMCPMC2293318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.