Trial reportCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2008
Telehomecare for patients with multiple chronic illnesses: Pilot study.
Trial report in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A realist review of factors critical for the implementation of eHealth in chronic disease management.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- The Experiences and Perceptions of Telehealth in Patients Living With Advanced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Pooled it
- Tailored or adapted interventions for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and at least one other long-term condition: a mixed methods review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- The Empirical Foundations of Telemedicine Interventions in Primary Care.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2016Pooled it
- A systematic review of clinician and staff views on the acceptability of incorporating remote monitoring technology into primary care.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2014Pooled it
- A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAPooled it
- Transferability of nurse-led interventions for cardiovascular health across diverse nursing roles in primary and community settings: Practice implications and solutions from a scoping review.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Review
- Real-Time Fault-Tolerant mHealth System: Comprehensive Review of Healthcare Services, Opens Issues, Challenges and Methodological Aspects.Journal of medical systems · 2018Review
- What are the effective elements in patient-centered and multimorbidity care? A scoping review.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Based Real Time Remote Health Monitoring Systems: A Review on Patients Prioritization and Related "Big Data" Using Body Sensors information and Communication Technology.Journal of medical systems · 2017Article
- The Continuum of HIV Care in Rural Communities in the United States and Canada: What Is Known and Future Research Directions.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2017Review
- Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating Mobile Health Technologies for Managing Chronic Conditions in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2016Article
- A multi-level qualitative analysis of Telehomecare in Ontario: challenges and opportunities.BMC health services research · 2015Article
- Paediatricians' opinions of microneedle-mediated monitoring: a key stage in the translation of microneedle technology from laboratory into clinical practice.Drug delivery and translational research · 2015Article
- Referral and management options for patients with chronic kidney disease: perspectives of patients, generalists and specialists.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Article
- Assessing the implementability of telehealth interventions for self-management support: a realist review.Implementation science : IS · 2015Review
- Integrating telehealth technology into a clinical pharmacy telephonic diabetes management program.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2011Article
- Children with medical complexity: an emerging population for clinical and research initiatives.Pediatrics · 2011Review
- Internet-based support for cardiovascular disease management.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2011Article
- Health technology assessment review: remote monitoring of vital signs--current status and future challenges.Critical care (London, England) · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedHumber, Jennie [corrected to Humbert, Jennie]
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the feasibility and efficacy of integrating home health monitoring into a primary care setting.
designA mixed method was used for this pilot study. It included in-depth interviews, focus groups, and surveys.
settingA semirural family health network in eastern Ontario comprising 8 physicians and 5 nurses caring for approximately 10 000 patients.
participantsPurposeful sample of 22 patients chosen from the experimental group of 120 patients 50 years old or older in a larger randomized controlled trial (N = 240). These patients had chronic illnesses and were identified as being at risk based on objective criteria and physician assessment.
interventionsBetween November 2004 and March 2006, 3 nurse practitioners and a pharmacist installed telehomecare units with 1 or more peripheral devices (eg, blood-pressure monitor, weight scale, glucometer) in patients' homes. The nurse practitioners incorporated individualized instructions for using the unit into each patient's care plan. Patients used the units every morning for collecting data, entering values into the system either manually or directly through supplied peripherals. The information was transferred to a secure server and was then uploaded to a secure Web-based application that allowed care providers to access and review it from any location with Internet access. The devices were monitored in the office on weekdays by the nurse practitioners.
main outcome measuresAcceptance and use of the units, patients' and care providers' satisfaction with the system, and patients' demographic and health characteristics.
resultsAll 22 patients, 12 men and 10 women with an average age of 73 years (range 60 to 88 years), agreed to participate. Most were retired, and a few were receiving community services. Common diagnoses included hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. All patients had blood pressure monitors installed, 11 had wired weight scales,5 had glucometers, and 5 had pulse oximeters. The units were in place for 9 to 339 days. Three patients asked to have the systems removed early because they did not use them or found them inconvenient. The other patients and their informal caregivers found the technology user-friendly and useful. Health care providers were satisfied with the technology and found the equipment useful. They thought it might reduce the number of office visits patients made and help track long-term trends.
conclusionThese pilot results demonstrate that telehomecare monitoring in a collaborative care community family practice is feasible and well used, and might improve access to and quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18208957PMC2293318What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.