Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18207148›Full record

ReviewJournal of chromatography. A2008

Electrophoretic separations on microfluidic chips.

Dapeng Wu, Jianhua Qin, Bingcheng Lin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chromatography. A, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Microscale Diffusiophoresis of Proteins.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Recent Advances in Microscale Western Blotting.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dapeng WuDalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Jianhua Qin
Bingcheng Lin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review presents a brief outline and novel developments of electrophoretic separation in microfluidic chips. Distinct characteristics of microchip electrophoresis (MCE) are discussed first, in which sample injection plug, joule heat, channel turn, surface adsorption and modification are introduced, and some successful strategies and recognized conclusions are also included. Important achievements of microfluidic electrophoresis separation in small molecules, DNA and protein are then summarized. This review is aimed at researchers, who are interested in MCE and want to adopt MCE as a functional unit in their integrated microsystems.

Indexed as

AdsorptionDimethylpolysiloxanesDNAElectrophoresis, MicrochipProteinsSiliconesSpectrophotometry, UltravioletSurface PropertiesTemperaturebaysilonDimethylpolysiloxanesDNAProteinsSilicones

Identifiers

PMID18207148
PMCPMC7094303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.