Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18206309›Full record

Trial reportPain2008

How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists.

Annette Bishop, Nadine E Foster, Elaine Thomas, Elaine M Hay

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03058315 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Cohort Study With 52 Weeks Follow-up Investigating the Influence of Disease Perception on Functional Outcome Among Patients Referred From General Practice to Secondary Care for Treatment of Low Back Pain.

TypeobservationalSponsorCentral Jutland Regional HospitalRan2017 to 2019Enrolled828ConditionsLow Back Pain
NCT03953625 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Interest of the Return to Primary Care of the "Low Back Booklet" of Health Insurance in the Recovery of Common Acute Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondation Hôpital Saint-JosephRan2018 to 2021Enrolled33ConditionsLow Back PainArmsdelivery of the low back pain booklet
NCT05589311 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Transformative Learning to Virtual Inter-Professional Education in Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomised Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingHealth PolyclinicsRan2022 to 2023Enrolled300ConditionsMusculoskeletal PainArmsTransformative Learning principles, Conventional didactic approach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 281 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A modern way to teach and practice manual therapy.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annette BishopPrimary Care Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK. a.bishop@cphc.keele.ac.uk
Nadine E Foster
Elaine Thomas
Elaine M Hay
Keele University · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guidelines for the management of low back pain (LBP) have existed for many years, but adherence to these by health care practitioners (HCPs) remains suboptimal. The aim of this study was to measure the attitudes, beliefs and reported clinical behaviour of UK physiotherapists (PTs) and general practitioners (GPs) about LBP and to explore the associations between these. A cross-sectional postal survey of GPs (n=2000) and PTs (n=2000) was conducted that included the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABT.PT), and a vignette of a patient with non-specific LBP (NSLBP) with questions asking about recommendations for work, activity and bedrest. Data from 1022 respondents (442 GPs and 580 PTs) who had recently treated patients with LBP were analysed. Although the majority of HCPs reported providing advice for the vignette patient that was broadly in line with guideline recommendations, 28% reported they would advise this patient to remain off work. Work advice was significantly related to the PABS.PT scores with higher biomedical (F(1,986)=77.5, p<0.0001) and lower behavioural (F(1,981)=31.9, p<0.001) scores associated with advice to remain off work. We have demonstrated that the attitudes and reported practice behaviour of UK GPs and PTs for patients with NSLBP are diverse. Many HCPs held the belief that LBP necessitates some avoidance of activities and work. The attitudes and beliefs of these HCPs were associated with their self-reported clinical behaviour regarding advice about work. Future studies need to investigate whether approaches aimed at modifying these HCP factors can lead to improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCultureHealth Care SurveysPhysician-Patient RelationsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLow Back PainMalePhysical Therapy SpecialtyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID18206309
PMCPMC2258319
OpenAlexW2058789879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.