Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18205956›Full record

SynthesisBreast cancer research : BCR2008

Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review.

Sue Kyung Park, Daehee Kang, Katherine A McGlynn, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Yeonju Kim, Keun Young Yoo, Louise A Brinton

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Birth weight and adult cancer incidence: large prospective study and meta-analysis.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Association of high birth weight with risk of early-onset colorectal cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Epidemiology beyond its limits.Science advances · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Relationship of Pre and Early Postnatal Risk Factors with Breast Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sue Kyung ParkDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Yeongeon-dong, Jongro-gu, Seoul 110-799, Seoul, Republic of Korea. suepark@snu.ac.kr
Daehee Kang
Katherine A McGlynn
Montserrat Garcia-Closas
Yeonju Kim
Keun Young Yoo
Louise A Brinton

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVarious perinatal factors, including birth weight, birth order, maternal age, gestational age, twin status, and parental smoking, have been postulated to affect breast cancer risk in daughters by altering the hormonal environment of the developing fetal mammary glands. Despite ample biologic plausibility, epidemiologic studies to date have yielded conflicting results. We investigated the associations between perinatal factors and subsequent breast cancer risk through meta-analyses.

methodsWe reviewed breast cancer studies published from January 1966 to February 2007 that included data on birth weight, birth order, maternal age, gestational age, twin status, and maternal or paternal smoking. Meta-analyses using random effect models were employed to summarize the results.

resultsWe found that heavier birth weights were associated with increased breast cancer risk, with studies involving five categories of birth weight identifying odds ratios (ORs) of 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04 to 1.48) for 4,000 g or more and 1.15 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.26) for 3,500 g to 3,999 g, relative to a birth weight of 2,500 to 2,599 g. These studies provided no support for a J-shaped relationship of birthweight to risk. Support for an association with birthweight was also derived from studies based on three birth weight categories (OR 1.15 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.31] for > or =4,000 g relative to <3,000 g) and two birth weight categories (OR 1.09 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.18] for > or =3,000 g relative to <3,000 g). Women born to older mothers and twins were also at some increased risk, but the results were heterogeneous across studies and publication years. Birth order, prematurity, and maternal smoking were unrelated to breast cancer risk.

conclusionOur findings provide some support for the hypothesis that in utero exposures reflective of higher endogenous hormone levels could affect risk for development of breast cancer in adulthood.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsEstrogensFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRisk FactorsEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID18205956
PMCPMC2374960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.