Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18205925›Full record

ArticleRetrovirology2008

Variation in HIV-1 R5 macrophage-tropism correlates with sensitivity to reagents that block envelope: CD4 interactions but not with sensitivity to other entry inhibitors.

Paul J Peters, Maria J Duenas-Decamp, W Matthew Sullivan, Richard Brown, Chiambah Ankghuambom, Katherine Luzuriaga, James Robinson, Dennis R Burton, Jeanne Bell, Peter Simmonds and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Retrovirology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul J PetersCenter for AIDS Research, Program in Molecular Medicine and Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, 373 Plantation Street, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA. Paul.Peters@umassmed.edu
Maria J Duenas-Decamp
W Matthew Sullivan
Richard Brown
Chiambah Ankghuambom
Katherine Luzuriaga
James Robinson
Dennis R Burton
Jeanne Bell
Peter Simmonds
Jonathan Ball
Paul R Clapham
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USQueen's Medical Centre · GBScripps Research Institute · USTulane University · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

HIV-1 tropism neuropathogenesis and therapyR01MH064408 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CLAPHAM, PAUL R · 2001 to 2011
$3.5M
Divergent narrow and broad tropisms HIV-1 R5 virusesR01AI062514 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CLAPHAM, PAUL R · 2004 to 2008
$2.0M
Tropism and transmissibility of HIV-1 envelopes in semenR01HD049273 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CLAPHAM, PAUL R · 2005 to 2009
$1.3M
Medical Research Council G0500863NIAID NIH HHS AI062514NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI062514NICHD NIH HHS HD049273NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049273NIMH NIH HHS MH064408NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV-1 R5 viruses cause most of the AIDS cases worldwide and are preferentially transmitted compared to CXCR4-using viruses. Furthermore, R5 viruses vary extensively in capacity to infect macrophages and highly macrophage-tropic variants are frequently identified in the brains of patients with dementia. Here, we investigated the sensitivity of R5 envelopes to a range of inhibitors and antibodies that block HIV entry. We studied a large panel of R5 envelopes, derived by PCR amplification without culture from brain, lymph node, blood and semen. These R5 envelopes conferred a wide range of macrophage tropism and included highly macrophage-tropic variants from brain and non-macrophage-tropic variants from lymph node.

resultsR5 macrophage-tropism correlated with sensitivity to inhibition by reagents that inhibited gp120:CD4 interactions. Thus, increasing macrophage-tropism was associated with increased sensitivity to soluble CD4 and to IgG-CD4 (PRO 542), but with increased resistance to the anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (mab), Q4120. These observations were highly significant and are consistent with an increased affinity of envelope for CD4 for macrophage-tropic envelopes. No overall correlations were noted between R5 macrophage-tropism and sensitivity to CCR5 antagonists or to gp41 specific reagents. Intriguingly, there was a relationship between increasing macrophage-tropism and increased sensitivity to the CD4 binding site mab, b12, but decreased sensitivity to 2G12, a mab that binds a glycan complex on gp120.

conclusionVariation in R5 macrophage-tropism is caused by envelope variation that predominantly influences sensitivity to reagents that block gp120:CD4 interactions. Such variation has important implications for therapy using viral entry inhibitors and for the design of envelope antigens for vaccines.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, MonoclonalBrainCell LineHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV Envelope Protein gp120HIV Fusion InhibitorsHIV InfectionsHumansInfantInhibitory Concentration 50Lymph NodesMacrophagesNeutralization TestsVirus InternalizationAntibodies, Monoclonalgp120 protein, Human immunodeficiency virus 1HIV AntibodiesHIV Envelope Protein gp120HIV Fusion Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID18205925
PMCPMC2268948
OpenAlexW2002702640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.