ArticleGenetic epidemiology2008
An ensemble learning approach jointly modeling main and interaction effects in genetic association studies.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Assemble the shallow or integrate a deep? Toward a lightweight solution for glyph-aware Chinese text classification.PloS one · 2023Article
- Detecting gene-gene interactions for complex quantitative traits using generalized fuzzy classification.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Ensemble survival tree models to reveal pairwise interactions of variables with time-to-events outcomes in low-dimensional setting.Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology · 2018Article
- Identification of multiple gene-gene interactions for ordinal phenotypes.BMC medical genomics · 2013Article
- Efficient simulation of epistatic interactions in case-parent trios.Human heredity · 2013Article
- An omnibus permutation test on ensembles of two-locus analyses can detect pure epistasis and genetic heterogeneity in genome-wide association studies.SpringerPlus · 2013Article
- SNP selection in genome-wide and candidate gene studies via penalized logistic regression.Genetic epidemiology · 2010Article
- Identification of interacting genes in genome-wide association studies using a model-based two-stage approach.Annals of human genetics · 2010Article
- Analysis of North American Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium data using a penalized logistic regression approach.BMC proceedings · 2009Article
- Detecting purely epistatic multi-locus interactions by an omnibus permutation test on ensembles of two-locus analyses.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- Detecting gene-gene interactions that underlie human diseases.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complex diseases are presumed to be the results of interactions of several genes and environmental factors, with each gene only having a small effect on the disease. Thus, the methods that can account for gene-gene interactions to search for a set of marker loci in different genes or across genome and to analyze these loci jointly are critical. In this article, we propose an ensemble learning approach (ELA) to detect a set of loci whose main and interaction effects jointly have a significant association with the trait. In the ELA, we first search for "base learners" and then combine the effects of the base learners by a linear model. Each base learner represents a main effect or an interaction effect. The result of the ELA is easy to interpret. When the ELA is applied to analyze a data set, we can get a final model, an overall P-value of the association test between the set of loci involved in the final model and the trait, and an importance measure for each base learner and each marker involved in the final model. The final model is a linear combination of some base learners. We know which base learner represents a main effect and which one represents an interaction effect. The importance measure of each base learner or marker can tell us the relative importance of the base learner or marker in the final model. We used intensive simulation studies as well as a real data set to evaluate the performance of the ELA. Our simulation studies demonstrated that the ELA is more powerful than the single-marker test in all the simulation scenarios. The ELA also outperformed the other three existing multi-locus methods in almost all cases. In an application to a large-scale case-control study for Type 2 diabetes, the ELA identified 11 single nucleotide polymorphisms that have a significant multi-locus effect (P-value=0.01), while none of the single nucleotide polymorphisms showed significant marginal effects and none of the two-locus combinations showed significant two-locus interaction effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.