Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18205210›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2008

An ensemble learning approach jointly modeling main and interaction effects in genetic association studies.

Zhaogong Zhang, Shuanglin Zhang, Man-Yu Wong, Nicholas J Wareham, Qiuying Sha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhaogong ZhangDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan 49931, USA.
Shuanglin Zhang
Man-Yu Wong
Nicholas J Wareham
Qiuying Sha

Funding

Statistical methods for analyzing high-throughput genotype dataR01HG003054 · NHGRI · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI ZHU, XIAOFENG · 2005 to 2017
$3.6M
Statistical Methods for Mapping Complex Disease GenesR01GM069940 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, SHUANGLIN · 2005 to 2007
$682k
Statistical Methods for Admixture MappingR03HG003613 · NHGRI · MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, SHUANGLIN · 2005 to 2007
$223k
Mapping Complex Disease Genes Incorporating Age-at-onsetR03AG024491 · NIA · MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, HUANN-SHENG · 2004 to 2005
$142k
Medical Research Council MC_U106179471NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003054NHGRI NIH HHS R03 HG 003613NHGRI NIH HHS R03 HG003613NIA NIH HHS R03 AG024491NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex diseases are presumed to be the results of interactions of several genes and environmental factors, with each gene only having a small effect on the disease. Thus, the methods that can account for gene-gene interactions to search for a set of marker loci in different genes or across genome and to analyze these loci jointly are critical. In this article, we propose an ensemble learning approach (ELA) to detect a set of loci whose main and interaction effects jointly have a significant association with the trait. In the ELA, we first search for "base learners" and then combine the effects of the base learners by a linear model. Each base learner represents a main effect or an interaction effect. The result of the ELA is easy to interpret. When the ELA is applied to analyze a data set, we can get a final model, an overall P-value of the association test between the set of loci involved in the final model and the trait, and an importance measure for each base learner and each marker involved in the final model. The final model is a linear combination of some base learners. We know which base learner represents a main effect and which one represents an interaction effect. The importance measure of each base learner or marker can tell us the relative importance of the base learner or marker in the final model. We used intensive simulation studies as well as a real data set to evaluate the performance of the ELA. Our simulation studies demonstrated that the ELA is more powerful than the single-marker test in all the simulation scenarios. The ELA also outperformed the other three existing multi-locus methods in almost all cases. In an application to a large-scale case-control study for Type 2 diabetes, the ELA identified 11 single nucleotide polymorphisms that have a significant multi-locus effect (P-value=0.01), while none of the single nucleotide polymorphisms showed significant marginal effects and none of the two-locus combinations showed significant two-locus interaction effects.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceBiometryDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Epidemiologic MethodsEpistasis, GeneticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLogistic ModelsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID18205210
PMCPMC3572743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.