ReviewEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2008
Will resistance in fungi emerge on a scale similar to that seen in bacteria?
Review in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antifungal spectrum, in vivo efficacy, and structure-activity relationship of ilicicolin h.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2012Article
- Azole resistance by loss of function of the sterol Δ⁵,⁶-desaturase gene (ERG3) in Candida albicans does not necessarily decrease virulence.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2012Article
- Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study.Annals of intensive care · 2011Article
- Activity of MGCD290, a Hos2 histone deacetylase inhibitor, in combination with azole antifungals against opportunistic fungal pathogens.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2009Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing numbers of patients receive azoles as prophylaxis or treatment for invasive fungal infections, begging the question of whether emergence of resistance will occur, as has been seen with bacteria. This review examines resistance pathways shared by bacteria and fungi, including alteration and overproduction of drug targets, changes in biosynthetic pathways, and enhanced drug efflux, and assesses whether such commonalities predict increased resistance to azoles. Important differences exist between the two kingdoms, including little, if any, horizontal transfer of extrachromosomal material across fungal species and a longer fungal generation time, thereby slowing vertical transfer of mutant traits. Further, no enzymatic modulation or inactivation of azoles has been reported in fungi. The newer broad-spectrum azoles posaconazole and voriconazole are active against the vast majority of yeasts and moulds and are likely to prevent the emergence of inherently resistant strains. Therefore, the likelihood for an explosion of fungal resistance is relatively low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.