ArticleJournal of neurology2008
Hypertension risk in idiopathic hyperCKemia.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- The acute effect of beta-guanidinopropionic acid versus creatine or placebo in healthy men (ABC-Trial): A randomized controlled first-in-human trial.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Extracellular creatine kinase may modulate purinergic signalling.Purinergic signalling · 2020Review
- Creatine Kinase and Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Creatine kinase, energy reserve, and hypertension: from bench to bedside.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Review
- Cardiovascular function is not associated with creatine kinase activity in a black African population: The SABPA study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2016Article
- Creatinine kinase and hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with idiopathic hyperCKemia are usually reassured and discharged. However, these subjects may have increased hypertension risk, based on data from our population study, which showed that the population tertile with the highest serum creatine kinase activities had the highest systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels. Therefore, we assessed whether subjects with idiopathic hyperCKemia have greater occurrence of hypertension than controls. We included 46 participants aged 18 to 67 years, diagnosed with idiopathic hyperCKemia at the departments of Neurology of the Universities of Amsterdam and Utrecht, The Netherlands. We found that 48% of the subjects with idiopathic hyperCKemia were hypertensive, as compared to 19% of the random population controls (n = 22,612, aged 20 to 65 years), an odds ratio of 3.9 (95 % CI, 2.2 to 6.9) before, and 2.0 (1.1 to 3.8) after adjustment for sex, age, and body mass index. In accord with our previous finding of an association between creatine kinase and blood pressure in the general population, the data reported here suggest that subjects with idiopathic hyperCKemia have greater hypertension risk than controls. This may be due to relatively high tissue creatine kinase activity, resulting in greater ATP buffer capacity to create and sustain high blood pressure levels.Larger, prospective studies are needed to further assess this association, but as active case finding is important in the diagnosis of hypertension, subjects with idiopathic hyperCKemia should be screened and monitored for the presence of hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.