Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18202389›Full record

ArticleGenetics2008

Molecular population genetics of Drosophila subtelomeric DNA.

Jennifer A Anderson, Yun S Song, Charles H Langley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Paralogs of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Short and long-term evolutionary dynamics of subtelomeric piRNA clusters in Drosophila.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sperm should evolve to make female meiosis fair.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer A AndersonSection of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis 95616, USA. janders@ucdavis.edu
Yun S Song
Charles H Langley

Funding

Drosophila Population GenomicsR01HG002942 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LANGLEY, CHARLES HUNT · 2004 to 2011
$8.2M
Novel Methods for Characterizing Recombination and SelectionK99GM080099 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SONG, YUN S. · 2007 to 2007
$85k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002942NHGRI NIH HHS R01-HG002942NIGMS NIH HHS 1K99-GM080099NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM080099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA sequence surveys in yeast and humans suggest that the forces shaping telomeric polymorphism and divergence are distinctly more dynamic than those in the euchromatic, gene-rich regions of the chromosomes. However, the generality of this pattern across outbreeding, multicellular eukaryotes has not been determined. To characterize the structure and evolution of Drosophila telomeres, we collected and analyzed molecular population genetics data from the X chromosome subtelomere in 58 lines of North American Drosophila melanogaster and 29 lines of African D. melanogaster. We found that Drosophila subtelomeres exhibit high levels of both structural and substitutional polymorphism relative to linked euchromatic regions. We also observed strikingly different patterns of variation in the North American and African samples. Moreover, our analyses of the polymorphism data identify a localized hotspot of recombination in the most-distal portion of the X subtelomere. While the levels of polymorphism decline sharply and in parallel with rates of crossing over per physical length over the distal first euchromatic megabase pairs of the X chromosome, our data suggest that they rise again sharply in the subtelomeric region (approximately 80 kbp). These patterns of historical recombination and geographic differentiation indicate that, similar to yeast and humans, Drosophila subtelomeric DNA is evolving very differently from euchromatic DNA.

Indexed as

AfricaAnimalsChromosomesCrossing Over, GeneticDNADrosophila melanogasterMolecular Sequence DataNorth AmericaPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePopulation DynamicsTelomereDNA

Identifiers

PMID18202389
PMCPMC2206096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.