Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18202385›Full record

ArticleGenetics2008

Testing for archaic hominin admixture on the X chromosome: model likelihoods for the modern human RRM2P4 region from summaries of genealogical topology under the structured coalescent.

Murray P Cox, Fernando L Mendez, Tatiana M Karafet, Maya Metni Pilkington, Sarah B Kingan, Giovanni Destro-Bisol, Beverly I Strassmann, Michael F Hammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  6. Divergence, demography and gene loss along the human lineage.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic structure in African populations: implications for human demographic history.Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology · 2009
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Murray P CoxDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721, USA.
Fernando L Mendez
Tatiana M Karafet
Maya Metni Pilkington
Sarah B Kingan
Giovanni Destro-Bisol
Beverly I Strassmann
Michael F Hammer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 2.4-kb stretch within the RRM2P4 region of the X chromosome, previously sequenced in a sample of 41 globally distributed humans, displayed both an ancient time to the most recent common ancestor (e.g., a TMRCA of approximately 2 million years) and a basal clade composed entirely of Asian sequences. This pattern was interpreted to reflect a history of introgressive hybridization from archaic hominins (most likely Asian Homo erectus) into the anatomically modern human genome. Here, we address this hypothesis by resequencing the 2.4-kb RRM2P4 region in 131 African and 122 non-African individuals and by extending the length of sequence in a window of 16.5 kb encompassing the RRM2P4 pseudogene in a subset of 90 individuals. We find that both the ancient TMRCA and the skew in non-African representation in one of the basal clades are essentially limited to the central 2.4-kb region. We define a new summary statistic called the minimum clade proportion (pmc), which quantifies the proportion of individuals from a specified geographic region in each of the two basal clades of a binary gene tree, and then employ coalescent simulations to assess the likelihood of the observed central RRM2P4 genealogy under two alternative views of human evolutionary history: recent African replacement (RAR) and archaic admixture (AA). A molecular-clock-based TMRCA estimate of 2.33 million years is a statistical outlier under the RAR model; however, the large variance associated with this estimate makes it difficult to distinguish the predictions of the human origins models tested here. The pmc summary statistic, which has improved power with larger samples of chromosomes, yields values that are significantly unlikely under the RAR model and fit expectations better under a range of archaic admixture scenarios.

Indexed as

Genealogy and HeraldryModels, GeneticChromosomes, Human, XDemographyDNA, IntergenicGenetic VariationHumansLikelihood FunctionsPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNADNA, Intergenic

Identifiers

PMID18202385
PMCPMC2206091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.