Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18202377›Full record

ArticleGenetics2008

Population genetics of speciation in two closely related wild tomatoes (Solanum section Lycopersicon).

Thomas Städler, Uraiwan Arunyawat, Wolfgang Stephan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. A chromosome-level genome assembly ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. TheG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Inference of seed bank parameters in two wild tomato species using ecological and genetic data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas StädlerDepartment Biologie II, Abteilung Evolutionsbiologie, University of Munich (LMU), 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany. thomas.staedler@env.ethz.ch
Uraiwan Arunyawat
Wolfgang Stephan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a multilocus sequencing study to assess patterns of polymorphism and divergence in the closely related wild tomato species, Solanum peruvianum and S. chilense (Solanum section Lycopersicon, Solanaceae). The data set comprises seven mapped nuclear loci (approximately 9.3 kb of analyzed sequence across loci) and four local population samples per species that cover much of the species' range (between 80 and 88 sequenced alleles across both species). We employ the analytical framework of divergence population genetics (DPG) in evaluating the utility of the "isolation" model of speciation to explain observed patterns of polymorphism and divergence. Whereas the isolation model is not rejected by goodness-of-fit criteria established via coalescent simulations, patterns of intragenic linkage disequilibrium provide evidence for postdivergence gene flow at two of the seven loci. These results suggest that speciation occurred under residual gene flow, implying that natural selection is one of the evolutionary forces driving the divergence of these tomato species. This inference is fully consistent with their recent divergence, conservatively estimated to be <or=0.55 million years. We discuss possible biases in the demographic parameter estimates due to the current restriction of DPG algorithms to panmictic species.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationGene FlowGeographyLinkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePopulation DynamicsRecombination, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNASolanum lycopersicumSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID18202377
PMCPMC2206082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.