Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18201834›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2008

Limb remote-preconditioning protects against focal ischemia in rats and contradicts the dogma of therapeutic time windows for preconditioning.

C Ren, X Gao, G K Steinberg, H Zhao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A meta-analysis of remote ischaemic conditioning in experimental stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Ischemic Conditioning Is Safe and Effective for Octo- and Nonagenarians in Stroke Prevention and Treatment.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2015
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Ischemic Tolerance Induced by Glial Cells.Neurochemical research · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

C RenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, MSLS Building, P306, 1201 Welch Road, Room P306, Stanford, CA 94305-5327, USA.
X Gao
G K Steinberg
H Zhao
Stanford Medicine · USStanford University · US

Funding

Transgenic animal injury paradigmsP01NS037520 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STEINBERG, GARY K · 1999 to 2008
$10.8M
NMDA ANTAGONISTS IN THE TREATMENT OF STROKER01NS027292 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STEINBERG, GARY K · 1991 to 2009
$3.7M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS037520NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS37520NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS027292NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS27292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote ischemic preconditioning is an emerging concept for stroke treatment, but its protection against focal stroke has not been established. We tested whether remote preconditioning, performed in the ipsilateral hind limb, protects against focal stroke and explored its protective parameters. Stroke was generated by a permanent occlusion of the left distal middle cerebral artery (MCA) combined with a 30 min occlusion of the bilateral common carotid arteries (CCA) in male rats. Limb preconditioning was generated by 5 or 15 min occlusion followed with the same period of reperfusion of the left hind femoral artery, and repeated for two or three cycles. Infarct was measured 2 days later. The results showed that rapid preconditioning with three cycles of 15 min performed immediately before stroke reduced infarct size from 47.7+/-7.6% of control ischemia to 9.8+/-8.6%; at two cycles of 15 min, infarct was reduced to 24.7+/-7.3%; at two cycles of 5 min, infarct was not reduced. Delayed preconditioning with three cycles of 15 min conducted 2 days before stroke also reduced infarct to 23.0+/-10.9%, but with two cycles of 15 min it offered no protection. The protective effects at these two therapeutic time windows of remote preconditioning are consistent with those of conventional preconditioning, in which the preconditioning ischemia is induced in the brain itself. Unexpectedly, intermediate preconditioning with three cycles of 15 min performed 12 h before stroke also reduced infarct to 24.7+/-4.7%, which contradicts the current dogma for therapeutic time windows for the conventional preconditioning that has no protection at this time point. In conclusion, remote preconditioning performed in one limb protected against ischemic damage after focal cerebral ischemia.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain InfarctionDisease Models, AnimalExtremitiesFunctional LateralityIschemiaIschemic PreconditioningMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTetrazolium SaltsTime FactorsTetrazolium Saltstriphenyltetrazolium

Identifiers

PMID18201834
PMCPMC2696348
OpenAlexW2021949562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.