Trial reportBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2008
Comparison of self-administered vaginal misoprostol versus placebo for cervical ripening prior to operative hysteroscopy using a sequential trial design.
Trial report in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative ripening of the cervix before operative hysteroscopy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- The methodology for developing a prospective meta-analysis in the family planning community.Trials · 2011Pooled it
- A combination of misoprostol and estradiol for preoperative cervical ripening in postmenopausal women: a randomised controlled trial.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2010Trial
- Does self-administered vaginal misoprostol result in cervical ripening in postmenopausal women after 14 days of pre-treatment with estradiol? Trial protocol for a randomised, placebo-controlled sequential trial.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2008Trial
- Cervical priming before diagnostic operative hysteroscopy in infertile women: a randomized, double-blind, controlled comparison of 2 vaginal misoprostol doses.International surgeryTrial
- Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Misoprostol Prior to Hysteroscopy in Women with Difficult Cervix: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Uterine cervical stenosis: from classification to advances in management. Overcoming the obstacles to access the uterine cavity.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Review
- Misoprostol Administration Before Hysteroscopy Procedures - A Retrospective Analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022Observational
- The effect of misoprostol on the removal of endometrial polyps: A pilot clinical trial.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2022Article
- Role of vaginal estradiol pretreatment combined with vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2016Article
- Effect of misoprostol for cervical priming before gynecological procedures on nonpregnant premenopausal women.Journal of natural science, biology, and medicine · 2015Article
- Intracervical versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical dilatation prior to operative hysteroscopy-a comparative study.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2012Article
- Uses of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynecology.Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology · 2009Article
- The use of misoprostol for cervical priming prior to hysteroscopy: a systematic review and analysis.Drug design, development and therapyArticle
- Cervical Priming by Misoprostol before Diagnostic Dilatation and Curettage: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of reproduction & infertilityArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the impact of 1000 micrograms of self-administered vaginal misoprostol versus self-administered vaginal placebo at home on preoperative cervical ripening in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women before operative hysteroscopy.
designTwo separate but identical parallel, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled sequential trials, one in premenopausal women and one in postmenopausal women. The boundaries for the sequential trials were calculated on the primary outcomes of a difference of cervical dilatation > or = 1 mm, with the assumption of a type 1 error of 0.05 and a power of 0.95.
settingNorwegian university teaching hospital. SAMPLE: Eighty-six women referred to outpatient operative hysteroscopy.
methodsThe women were randomised to either 1000 micrograms of self-administered vaginal misoprostol or self-administered vaginal placebo the evening before outpatient operative hysteroscopy.
main outcome measuresPreoperative cervical dilatation (primary outcome), number of women who achieve a preoperative cervical dilatation > or = 5 mm, acceptability, complications and adverse effects (secondary outcomes).
resultsIn premenopausal women, the mean cervical dilatation was 6.4 mm (SD 2.4) in the misoprostol group and 4.8 mm (SD 2.0) in the placebo group, the mean difference in cervical dilatation being 1.6 mm (95% CI 0.5-2.7). Among the premenopausal women receiving misoprostol, 88% achieved a cervical dilatation of > or = 5 mm compared with 65% in the placebo group. Twelve percent of the women who received misoprostol were difficult to dilate compared with 32% who received placebo. Dilatation was also quicker in the misoprostol group. Misoprostol had no effect on cervical ripening in postmenopausal women compared with placebo, and 43% of the women were difficult to dilate. The trials were terminated after analysis of 21 postmenopausal women and 65 premenopausal women after reaching a conclusion on the primary outcome with only 28% of the number of women needed in a fixed sample size trial. Three of 45 women who received misoprostol experienced severe lower abdominal pain, and there was an increased occurrence of light preoperative bleeding in the misoprostol group. Most women did not experience misoprostol-related adverse effects. The majority (83% of premenopausal and 76% of postmenopausal women) found self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home to be acceptable. There were two serious complications in the premenopausal misoprostol group: uterine perforation with subsequent peritonitis and heavy postoperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion, but these were not judged to be misoprostol related. Complications were otherwise comparatively minor and distributed equally between the two dosage groups.
conclusionsOne thousand micrograms of self-administered vaginal misoprostol 12 hours prior to operative hysteroscopy has a significant cervical ripening effect compared with placebo in premenopausal but not in postmenopausal women. Self-administered vaginal misoprostol of 1000 micrograms at home the evening before operative hysteroscopy is safe and highly acceptable, although a small proportion of women experienced severe lower abdominal pain. There is a risk of lower abdominal pain and light preoperative bleeding with this regimen, which is very cheap and easy to use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.