Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18201068›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2008

Contributions of the carboxyl-terminal helical segment to the self-association and lipoprotein preferences of human apolipoprotein E3 and E4 isoforms.

Takaaki Sakamoto, Masafumi Tanaka, Charulatha Vedhachalam, Margaret Nickel, David Nguyen, Padmaja Dhanasekaran, Michael C Phillips, Sissel Lund-Katz, Hiroyuki Saito

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Apolipoprotein E in lipid metabolism and neurodegenerative disease.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. APOE in the normal brain.Neurobiology of disease · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Helical structure, stability, and dynamics in human apolipoprotein E3 and E4 by hydrogen exchange and mass spectrometry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Takaaki SakamotoDepartment of Biophysical Chemistry, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Kobe 658-8558, Japan.
Masafumi Tanaka
Charulatha Vedhachalam
Margaret Nickel
David Nguyen
Padmaja Dhanasekaran
Michael C Phillips
Sissel Lund-Katz
Hiroyuki Saito
Philadelphia University · USKobe Pharmaceutical University · JPChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

STRUCTURAL BASIS OF THE INTERACTIONS OF APOLIPOPROTEIN ER01HL056083 · NHLBI · MCP HAHNEMANN UNIVERSITY · PI LUND-KATZ, SISSEL · 1997 to 2013
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL56083NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL056083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the molecular basis for the different self-association and lipoprotein preferences of apolipoprotein (apo) E isoforms, we compared the effects of progressive truncation of the C-terminal domain in human apoE3 and apoE4 on their lipid-free structure and lipid binding properties. A VLDL/HDL distribution assay demonstrated that apoE3 binds much better than apoE4 to HDL 3, whereas both isoforms bind similarly to VLDL. Removal of the C-terminal helical regions spanning residues 273-299 weakened the ability of both isoforms to bind to lipoproteins; this led to the elimination of the isoform lipoprotein preference, indicating that the C-terminal helices mediate the lipoprotein selectivity of apoE3 and apoE4 isoforms. Gel filtration chromatography experiments demonstrated that the monomer-tetramer distribution is different for the two isoforms with apoE4 being more monomeric than apoE3 and that removal of the C-terminal helices favors the monomeric state in both isoforms. Consistent with this, fluorescence measurements of Trp-264 in single-Trp mutants revealed that the C-terminal domain in apoE4 is less organized and more exposed to the aqueous environment than in apoE3. In addition, the solubilization of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine multilamellar vesicles is more rapid with apoE4 than with apoE3; removal of the C-terminal helices significantly affected solubilization rates with both isoforms. Taken together, these results indicate that the C-terminal domain is organized differently in apoE3 and apoE4 so that apoE4 self-associates less and binds less than apoE3 to HDL surfaces; these alterations may lead to the pathological sequelae for cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Apolipoprotein E3Apolipoprotein E4Chromatography, GelCircular DichroismHumansLipoproteinsLipoproteins, HDLLipoproteins, VLDLProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein DenaturationProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryApolipoprotein E3Apolipoprotein E4LipoproteinsLipoproteins, HDLLipoproteins, VLDL

Identifiers

PMID18201068
PMCPMC2692928
OpenAlexW1986838916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.