Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18199840›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2008

The evolutionary dynamics of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein interaction network after duplication.

Aviva Presser, Michael B Elowitz, Manolis Kellis, Roy Kishony

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Retention of duplicated genes in evolution.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Build to understand: synthetic approaches to biology.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2016
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Microfluidic screening and whole-genome sequencing identifies mutations associated with improved protein secretion by yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tangled up in two: a burst of genome duplications at the end of the Cretaceous and the consequences for plant evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Yeast evolutionary genomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2010
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aviva PresserSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Michael B Elowitz
Manolis Kellis
Roy Kishony

Funding

THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONAL MODULESP50GM068763 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI BENENSON, YAAKOV · 2003 to 2012
$28.9M
Regulatory Morif Discovery in the Human Genome Using Comparative GenomicsR01HG004037 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KELLIS, MANOLIS · 2007 to 2015
$3.9M
The population genetics of antibiotic resistance in multi-drug environmentsR01GM081617 · NIGMS · TECHNION-ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KISHONY, ROY · 2007 to 2018
$3.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004037NIGMS NIH HHS GM068763NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM068763NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081617NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM081617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplication is an important mechanism in the evolution of protein interaction networks. Duplications are followed by the gain and loss of interactions, rewiring the network at some unknown rate. Because rewiring is likely to change the distribution of network motifs within the duplicated interaction set, it should be possible to study network rewiring by tracking the evolution of these motifs. We have developed a mathematical framework that, together with duplication data from comparative genomic and proteomic studies, allows us to infer the connectivity of the preduplication network and the changes in connectivity over time. We focused on the whole-genome duplication (WGD) event in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The model allowed us to predict the frequency of intergene interaction before WGD and the post duplication probabilities of interaction gain and loss. We find that the predicted frequency of self-interactions in the preduplication network is significantly higher than that observed in today's network. This could suggest a structural difference between the modern and ancestral networks, preferential addition or retention of interactions between ohnologs, or selective pressure to preserve duplicates of self-interacting proteins.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationGenome, FungalProtein BindingProteomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18199840
PMCPMC2242688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.