Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18199665›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2008

Impact of hapten presentation on antibody binding at lipid membrane interfaces.

Hyunsook Jung, Tinglu Yang, Mauricio D Lasagna, Jinjun Shi, Gregory D Reinhart, Paul S Cremer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. In Vivo Evaluation of PamJournal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Engineered molecular sensors for quantifying cell surface crowding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Programmable Cell-Free Transcriptional Switches for Antibody Detection.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Tumor treatment by pHLIP-targeted antigen delivery.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  11. Antigen-Triggered Logic-Gating of DNA Nanodevices.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyunsook JungDepartment of Chemistry and Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA.
Tinglu Yang
Mauricio D Lasagna
Jinjun Shi
Gregory D Reinhart
Paul S Cremer
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

MECHANISMS ON ALLOSTERIC INFLUENCES ON ENZYMES ACTIVITYR01GM033216 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA NORMAN · PI REINHART, GREGORY DUNCAN · 1986 to 2012
$3.9M
Multivalent Ligand-Receptor Binding on Lipid BilayersR01GM070622 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM · PI CREMER, PAUL · 2004 to 2012
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM070622NIGMS NIH HHS GM33216NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM033216NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the effects of ligand presentation on the binding of aqueous proteins to solid supported lipid bilayers. Specifically, we show that the equilibrium dissociation constant can be strongly affected by ligand lipophilicity and linker length/structure. The apparent equilibrium dissociation constants (K(D)) were compared for two model systems, biotin/anti-biotin and 2,4-dinitrophenyl (DNP)/anti-DNP, in bulk solution and at model membrane surfaces. The binding constants in solution were obtained from fluorescence anisotropy measurements. The surface binding constants were determined by microfluidic techniques in conjunction with total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. The results showed that the bulk solution equilibrium dissociation constants for anti-biotin and anti-DNP were almost identical, K(D)(bulk) = 1.7 +/- 0.2 nM vs. 2.9 +/- 0.1 nM. By contrast, the dissociation constant for anti-biotin antibody was three orders of magnitude tighter than for anti-DNP at a lipid membrane interface, K(D) = 3.6 +/- 1.1 nM vs. 2.0 +/- 0.2 microM. We postulate that the pronounced difference in surface binding constants for these two similar antibodies is due to differences in the ligands' relative lipophilicity, i.e., the more hydrophobic DNP molecules had a stronger interaction with the lipid bilayers, rendering them less available to incoming anti-DNP antibodies compared with the biotin/anti-biotin system. However, when membrane-bound biotin ligands were well screened by a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) polymer brush, the K(D) value for the anti-biotin antibody could also be weakened by three orders of magnitude, 2.4 +/- 1.1 microM. On the other hand, the dissociation constant for anti-DNP antibodies at a lipid interface could be significantly enhanced when DNP haptens were tethered to the end of very long hydrophilic PEG lipopolymers (K(D) = 21 +/- 10 nM) rather than presented on short lipid-conjugated tethers. These results demonstrate that ligand presentation strongly influences protein interactions with membrane-bound ligands.

Indexed as

Antigen-Antibody ReactionsAntigen PresentationModels, ChemicalAntibodiesBinding SitesComputer SimulationHaptensLipid BilayersMembrane ProteinsProtein BindingSurface PropertiesAntibodiesHaptensLipid BilayersMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18199665
PMCPMC2275692
OpenAlexW1982588168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.