Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18197439›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2008

Constipation in cancer patients on morphine.

Joanne Droney, Joy Ross, Sophy Gretton, Ken Welsh, Hiroe Sato, Julia Riley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Constipation in people prescribed opioids.BMJ clinical evidence · 2010
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Impact of opioid-induced constipation on healthcare resource utilization and costs for cancer pain patients receiving continuous opioid therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Predictive factors for overall quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Laxative prescriptions to cancer outpatients receiving opioids: a study from the Norwegian prescription database.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Article
  15. A cross-sectional study of constipation and laxative use in advanced cancer patients: insights for revision of current practice.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Inadequate symptom control in advanced cancer patients across Europe.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joanne DroneyRoyal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK. jodroney@hotmail.com
Joy Ross
Sophy Gretton
Ken Welsh
Hiroe Sato
Julia Riley
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GBHospice UK · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goals of workConstipation is a significant problem in patients taking morphine for cancer pain. The aims of this study were (1) to assess the magnitude of constipation in this study cohort, (2) to analyse the constipation treatment strategies and (3) to look for evidence of inter-individual variation in both susceptibility to constipation and response to treatment with laxatives in this patient group. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was an observational study carried out in a tertiary referral cancer hospital. Two hundred seventy four patients were recruited to the study. All had a diagnosis of cancer and were on oral morphine for cancer pain. The main outcomes measured were subjective patient assessment of constipation severity in the preceding week and laxative use. Patients were asked to grade constipation in the preceding week on a four-point categorical scale: "not at all" (grade 0), "a little" (grade 1), "quite a bit" (grade 2) and "very much" (grade 3). Laxative dose groups (LDGs) were developed to assess laxative dosing.

resultsConstipation affects 72% of this cohort of patients. Constipation in this population is poorly managed. Eighty nine percent of constipated patients were on inadequate laxative therapy. Inter-individual variation in constipation on morphine exists: some patients do not experience constipation and do not need to take any laxatives, some patients do not experience constipation because they are taking laxatives and some patients experience constipation despite being on high dose laxatives. These three groups were compared in terms of cancer diagnosis, time on morphine, dose of morphine and other concomitant factors. No factor was identified to account for this inter-individual variation. Improvement in the clinical management of constipation is needed, with titration of laxatives according to individual patient need.

conclusionConstipation affects a large proportion of cancer patients taking oral morphine. Constipation in these patients is generally inadequately treated.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCohort StudiesConstipationDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansLaxativesMaleMorphineNeoplasmsPainPalliative CareTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidLaxativesMorphine

Identifiers

PMID18197439
OpenAlexW2001084488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.