Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18197434›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2008

Oral moxifloxacin or intravenous ceftriaxone for the treatment of low-risk neutropenic fever in cancer patients suitable for early hospital discharge.

Catherine Sebban, Sophie Dussart, Christine Fuhrmann, Hervé Ghesquieres, Isabelle Rodrigues, Lionel Geoffrois, Yves Devaux, Laurence Lancry, Giselle Chvetzoff, Thomas Bachelot and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ambulatory management of low-risk febrile neutropenia in adult oncological patients. Systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Is current initial empirical antibiotherapy appropriate to treat bloodstream infections in short-duration chemo-induced febrile neutropenia?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Observational
  8. A cohort study on protocol-based nurse-led out-patient management of post-chemotherapy low-risk febrile neutropenia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Independent factors for prediction of poor outcomes in patients with febrile neutropenia.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014
    Article
  11. Gender analysis of moxifloxacin clinical trials.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2014
    Review
  12. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index score: 10 years of use for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Review
  13. Health-related quality of life anticipated with different management strategies for febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Article
  14. Clinical factors predicting bacteremia in low-risk febrile neutropenia after anti-cancer chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Oral moxifloxacin for outpatient treatment of low-risk, febrile neutropenic patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2010
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine SebbanCentre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon, France. sebban@lyon.fnclcc.fr
Sophie Dussart
Christine Fuhrmann
Hervé Ghesquieres
Isabelle Rodrigues
Lionel Geoffrois
Yves Devaux
Laurence Lancry
Giselle Chvetzoff
Thomas Bachelot
Maria Chelghoum
Pierre Biron
Centre Léon Bérard · FRCentre Oscar Lambret · FRDélégation Centre-Est · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goals of workPatients with low-risk neutropenic fever as defined by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score might benefit from ambulatory treatment. Optimal management remains to be clearly defined, and new oral antibiotics need to be evaluated in this setting. MATERIALS AND

methodsCancer patients with febrile neutropenia and a favorable MASCC score were randomized between oral moxifloxacin and intravenous ceftriaxone. All were fit for early hospital discharge. The global success rate was related to the efficacy of monotherapy, as well as to the success of ambulatory monitoring. MAIN

resultsThe trial was closed prematurely because of low accrual. Ninety-six patients were included (47 in the ceftriaxone arm and 49 in the moxifloxacin arm). A total of 65% were women, 30.2% had lymphoma, 34.4% had metastatic, and 35.4% had non-metastatic solid tumors. The success rates of home antibiotics were 73.9% and 79.2% for ceftriaxone and moxifloxacin, respectively. Seven patients were not discharged, and 14 required re-hospitalization. There were 17% of microbiologically documented infections that were, in most cases, susceptible to oral monotherapy.

conclusionsThese results suggest that MASCC is a valid and useful tool to select patients for ambulatory treatments and that oral moxifloxacin monotherapy is safe and effective for the outpatient treatment of cancer patients with low-risk neutropenic fever.

Indexed as

Patient DischargeAdministration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsAza CompoundsCeftriaxoneFemaleFeverFluoroquinolonesHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsAza CompoundsCeftriaxoneFluoroquinolonesMoxifloxacinQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID18197434
OpenAlexW2037885820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.