Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18197247›Full record

ArticlePloS one2008

Adr1 and Cat8 mediate coactivator recruitment and chromatin remodeling at glucose-regulated genes.

Rhiannon K Biddick, G Lynn Law, Elton T Young

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The transcription factorsMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rhiannon K BiddickDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
G Lynn Law
Elton T Young
University of Washington · US

Funding

TRAINING IN MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2020
$21.0M
GENETIC REGULATION OF ALCOHOL METABOLISM IN YEASTR01GM026079 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YOUNG, ELTON T. · 1985 to 2013
$6.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM26079NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM026079NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007270NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM07270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdr1 and Cat8 co-regulate numerous glucose-repressed genes in S. cerevisiae, presenting a unique opportunity to explore their individual roles in coactivator recruitment, chromatin remodeling, and transcription. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe determined the individual contributions of Cat8 and Adr1 on the expression of a cohort of glucose-repressed genes and found three broad categories: genes that need both activators for full derepression, genes that rely mostly on Cat8 and genes that require only Adr1. Through combined expression and recruitment data, along with analysis of chromatin remodeling at two of these genes, ADH2 and FBP1, we clarified how these activators achieve this wide range of co-regulation. We find that Adr1 and Cat8 are not intrinsically different in their abilities to recruit coactivators but rather, promoter context appears to dictate which activator is responsible for recruitment to specific genes. These promoter-specific contributions are also apparent in the chromatin remodeling that accompanies derepression: ADH2 requires both Adr1 and Cat8, whereas, at FBP1, significant remodeling occurs with Cat8 alone. Although over-expression of Adr1 can compensate for loss of Cat8 at many genes in terms of both activation and chromatin remodeling, this over-expression cannot complement all of the cat8Delta phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Thus, at many of the glucose-repressed genes, Cat8 and Adr1 appear to have interchangeable roles and promoter architecture may dictate the roles of these activators.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNA-Binding ProteinsGlucosePolymerase Chain ReactionRNA Polymerase IISaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsTranscription Factor TFIIBADR1 protein, S cerevisiaeCAT8 protein, S cerevisiaeChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsGlucoseRNA Polymerase IISaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsTranscription Factor TFIIB

Identifiers

PMID18197247
PMCPMC2175534
OpenAlexW2074008904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.