Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18196400›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2008

Writing for clinical orthopaedics and related research.

Richard A Brand

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Please Say It Clearly: A Reflection on Proper Style of Scientific Reporting.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Writing for SICOT-J.SICOT-J · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Not the Last Word: Rethinking the Resident Research Requirement.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2017
    Article
  7. Attractive papers and accurate English.International orthopaedics · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Writing for the journal of wrist surgery.Journal of wrist surgery · 2012
    Article
  10. Reviewing for clinical orthopaedics and related research.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2012
    Review
  11. Editorial: Scientific reporting: how to focus the "good ole boy paper".Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Richard A Brand

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchPeer Review, ResearchPeriodicals as TopicWritingHumansOrthopedics

Identifiers

PMID18196400
PMCPMC2505311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.