Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18196358›Full record

SynthesisClinical orthopaedics and related research2008

Treatment of focal articular cartilage defects in the knee: a systematic review.

Robert A Magnussen, Warren R Dunn, James L Carey, Kurt P Spindler

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Changing trends in the use of cartilage restoration techniques for the patellofemoral joint: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Autologous chondrocyte implantation: a systematic review.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2010
    Pooled it
  7. Knee pain and mobility impairments: meniscal and articular cartilage lesions.The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy · 2010
    Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Effect of N-butyl cyanoacrylate on the regeneration of joint defects in mature male rats.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2025
    Article
  18. Histological Evaluation of the Effects of Intra-Articular Injection of Caffeic Acid on Cartilage Repair in a Rat Knee Microfracture Model.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert A MagnussenVanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute, 4200 Medical Center East, 1215 21st Avenue South, Suite 4200, Nashville, TN, 37232-8774, USA.
Warren R Dunn
James L Carey
Kurt P Spindler
In-Q-Tel · US

Funding

A Multi-center Cohort Study of ACL Reconstruction OutcomesK23AR052392 · NIAMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DUNN, WARREN R · 2006 to 2010
$605k
NIAMS NIH HHS 5K23 AR052392-02NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR052392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWe asked whether autologous chondrocyte implantation or osteochondral autograft transfer yields better clinical outcomes compared with one another or with traditional abrasive techniques for treatment of isolated articular cartilage defects and whether lesion size influences this clinical outcome. We performed a literature search and identified five randomized, controlled trials and one prospective comparative trial evaluating these treatment techniques in 421 patients. The operative procedures included autologous chondrocyte implantation, osteochondral autograft transfer, matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation, and microfracture. Minimum followup was 1 year (mean, 1.7 years; range, 1-3 years). All studies documented greater than 95% followup for clinical outcome measures. No technique consistently had superior results compared with the others. Outcomes for microfracture tended to be worse in larger lesions. All studies reported improvement in clinical outcome measures in all treatment groups when compared with preoperative assessment; however, no control (nonoperative) groups were used in any of the studies. A large prospective trial investigating these techniques with the addition of a control group would be the best way to definitively address the clinical questions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, SubchondralCartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesCell TransplantationChondrocytesEvidence-Based MedicineHumansKnee JointPatient SelectionRegenerationSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTransplantation, AutologousTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID18196358
PMCPMC2504649
OpenAlexW2009251377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.