Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18195289›Full record

SynthesisCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2008

Fish-oil supplementation in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a meta-analysis.

David J A Jenkins, Andrea R Josse, Joseph Beyene, Paul Dorian, Michael L Burr, Roxanne LaBelle, Cyril W C Kendall, Stephen C Cunnane

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. N-3 fatty acids for prevention of cardiovascular disease.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2014
    Review
  9. Omega-3 fatty acids: a growing ocean of choices.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Are dietary recommendations for the use of fish oils sustainable?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Article
  20. Should patients with cardiovascular disease take fish oil?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

David J A JenkinsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont. cyril.kendall@utoronto.ca
Andrea R Josse
Joseph Beyene
Paul Dorian
Michael L Burr
Roxanne LaBelle
Cyril W C Kendall
Stephen C Cunnane
St Michael's Hospital · GBCardiff University · GBSt Michael's Hospital · GBSt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA recent Cochrane meta-analysis did not confirm the benefits of fish and fish oil in the secondary prevention of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that examined the effect of fish-oil supplementation on ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia to determine the overall effect and to assess whether heterogeneity exists between trials.

methodsWe searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL) from inception to May 2007. We included randomized controlled trials of fish-oil supplementation on ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. The primary outcome was implantable cardioverter defibrillator discharge. We calculated relative risk [RR] for outcomes at 1-year follow-up for each study. We used the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects methods when there was significant heterogeneity between trials and the Mantel-Hanzel fixed-effects method when heterogeneity was negligible.

resultsWe identified 3 trials of 1-2 years' duration. These trials included a total of 573 patients who received fish oil and 575 patients who received a control. Meta-analysis of data collected at 1 year showed no overall effect of fish oil on the relative risk of implantable cardioverter defibrillator discharge. There was significant heterogeneity between trials. The second largest study showed a significant benefit of fish oil (relative risk [RR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.98). The smallest showed an adverse tendency at 1 year (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.92-1.65) and significantly worse outcome at 2 years among patients with ventricular tachycardia at study entry (log rank p = 0.007).

conclusionThese data indicate that there is heterogeneity in the response of patients to fish-oil supplementation. Caution should be used when prescribing fish-oil supplementation for patients with ventricular tachycardia.

Indexed as

DeathDefibrillators, ImplantableDietary SupplementsAdultAgedFemaleFish OilsFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPrimary PreventionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReference ValuesRisk AssessmentFish Oils

Identifiers

PMID18195289
PMCPMC2174988
OpenAlexW2120739418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.