Association of antiretinal antibodies in acute annular outer retinopathy.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

1. [Arch-shaped retinal appearance of a previously healthy women].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2017
   Article
2. [Progressive scotoma with perception of photopsia].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2016
   Article
3. Autologous antibodies to outer retina in acute zonal occult outer retinopathy.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2014
   Article
4. Predominant loss of rod-mediated electroretinogram response in a case of acute annular outer retinopathy.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2009
   Article
5. The need for standardization of antiretinal antibody detection and measurement.American journal of ophthalmology · 2008
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as