ArticleImplementation science : IS2008
Translating shared decision-making into health care clinical practices: proof of concepts.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluating the quality of shared decision making during the patient-carer encounter: a systematic review of tools.BMC research notes · 2016Pooled it
- Shared decision-making behaviours in health professionals: a systematic review of studies based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Pooled it
- A Dyad-Based Intervention to Improve Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy among People with HIV who Inject Drugs in Kazakhstan: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.AIDS and behavior · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Development of a Tool to Measure the Dyadic Process of Shared Decision Making in Young Children: The Making Decisions for Kids (MADE for Kids) Survey.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025Article
- Limited Evidence of Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening in Audio-Recorded Primary Care Visits Among Black Men and their Healthcare Providers.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2024Article
- Clinical Trial Protocol for a Randomized Trial of Community Health Worker-led Decision Coaching to Promote Shared Decision-making on Prostate Cancer Screening Among Black Male Patients and Their Providers.European urology focus · 2021Article
- Implementation of the three good questions-A feasibility study in Dutch hospital departments.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Article
- Developing a toolkit to implement the Statin Choice Conversation Aid at scale: application of a work reduction model.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Use of a patient decision aid for prenatal screening for Down syndrome: what do pregnant women say?BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2017Article
- More primary care patients regret health decisions if they experienced decisional conflict in the consultation: a secondary analysis of a multicenter descriptive study.BMC family practice · 2016Observational
- Health literacy in pregnant women facing prenatal screening may explain their intention to use a patient decision aid: a short report.BMC research notes · 2016Article
- Exploration of shared decision-making processes among dieticians and patients during a consultation for the nutritional treatment of dyslipidaemia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Article
- Insights from a conference on implementing comparative effectiveness research through shared decision-making.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2013Article
- Situationally-sensitive knowledge translation and relational decision making in hyperacute stroke: a qualitative study.PloS one · 2012Article
- The impact of physicians' reactions to uncertainty on patients' decision satisfaction.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2011Article
- Exploring dietitians' salient beliefs about shared decision-making behaviors.Implementation science : IS · 2011Article
- Helping high-risk youth move through high-risk periods: personally controlled health records for improving social and health care transitions.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2011Article
- Deliberation before determination: the definition and evaluation of good decision making.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is considerable interest today in shared decision-making (SDM), defined as a decision-making process jointly shared by patients and their health care provider. However, the data show that SDM has not been broadly adopted yet. Consequently, the main goal of this proposal is to bring together the resources and the expertise needed to develop an interdisciplinary and international research team on the implementation of SDM in clinical practice using a theory-based dyadic perspective.
methodsParticipants include researchers from Canada, US, UK, and Netherlands, representing medicine, nursing, psychology, community health and epidemiology. In order to develop a collaborative research network that takes advantage of the expertise of the team members, the following research activities are planned: 1) establish networking and on-going communication through internet-based forum, conference calls, and a bi-weekly e-bulletin; 2) hold a two-day workshop with two key experts (one in theoretical underpinnings of behavioral change, and a second in dyadic data analysis), and invite all investigators to present their views on the challenges related to the implementation of SDM in clinical practices; 3) conduct a secondary analyses of existing dyadic datasets to ensure that discussion among team members is grounded in empirical data; 4) build capacity with involvement of graduate students in the workshop and online forum; and 5) elaborate a position paper and an international multi-site study protocol. DISCUSSION: This study protocol aims to inform researchers, educators, and clinicians interested in improving their understanding of effective strategies to implement shared decision-making in clinical practice using a theory-based dyadic perspective.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.