Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18193917›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2008

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between allopurinol and probenecid in healthy subjects.

Sophie L Stocker, Kenneth M Williams, Andrew J McLachlan, Garry G Graham, Richard O Day

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Uricosuric medications for chronic gout.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Allopurinol for chronic gout.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Honorary Professor Garry Graham.Inflammopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  7. Individualising the dose of allopurinol in patients with gout.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Predicting allopurinol response in patients with gout.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016
    Article
  10. Review
  11. How do taste cells lacking synapses mediate neurotransmission? CALHM1, a voltage-gated ATP channel.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2013
    Review
  12. The pharmacokinetics of oxypurinol in people with gout.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie L StockerFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kenneth M Williams
Andrew J McLachlan
Garry G Graham
Richard O Day
University of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveCombination therapy with allopurinol and probenecid is used to treat tophaceous gout in patients who do not respond sufficiently to allopurinol alone. However, the potential interaction between these drugs has not been systematically investigated. The objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and hypouricaemic effect of oxypurinol (the active metabolite of allopurinol) and probenecid when administered alone and in combination in healthy subjects.

methodsAn open-label, randomized, three-way crossover clinical trial was conducted in 12 healthy adults. Subjects were randomized to receive treatment for 7 days with allopurinol (150 mg twice daily), probenecid (500 mg twice daily) or combination therapy with both drugs, with a 7-day washout period between treatments. Venous blood samples were collected predose (at 0 hours) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours after dosage for determination of oxypurinol and/or probenecid concentrations. Plasma and urinary urate concentrations were determined on each study day and at the end of each washout period. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were analysed using two-way ANOVA.

resultsCoadministration of allopurinol and probenecid significantly reduced average steady-state plasma oxypurinol concentrations (mean+/-SD: allopurinol alone 9.7+/-2.1 mg/L vs combination 5.1+/-1.0 mg/L, p<0.001). Probenecid concentrations were unaffected. Plasma urate concentrations decreased (p<0.01) during allopurinol therapy (0.16+/-0.05 mmol/L), probenecid therapy (0.13+/-0.02 mmol/L) and combination therapy (0.09+/-0.02 mmol/L) compared with baseline (0.30+/-0.05 mmol/L).

conclusionCoadministration of allopurinol and probenecid to healthy subjects had a greater hypouricaemic effect than either allopurinol or probenecid alone, despite a reduction in plasma oxypurinol concentrations when the drugs were taken concomitantly.

Indexed as

AdultAllopurinolAnalysis of VarianceArea Under CurveChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCreatinineCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleOxypurinolProbenecidTime FactorsUric AcidAllopurinolCreatinineOxypurinolProbenecidUric Acid

Identifiers

PMID18193917
OpenAlexW1964303561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.