Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18192612›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2008

RNA backbone: consensus all-angle conformers and modular string nomenclature (an RNA Ontology Consortium contribution).

Jane S Richardson, Bohdan Schneider, Laura W Murray, Gary J Kapral, Robert M Immormino, Jeffrey J Headd, David C Richardson, Daniela Ham, Eli Hershkovits, Loren Dean Williams and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Kink-Turn 7 Motif: An Additional Test for RNA Force Field Performance.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The structural basis for RNA slicing by human Argonaute2.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jane S RichardsonDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, 27710-3711, USA. jsr@kinemage.biochem.duke.edu
Bohdan Schneider
Laura W Murray
Gary J Kapral
Robert M Immormino
Jeffrey J Headd
David C Richardson
Daniela Ham
Eli Hershkovits
Loren Dean Williams
Kevin S Keating
Anna Marie Pyle
David Micallef
John Westbrook
Helen M Berman
RNA Ontology Consortium

Funding

MEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH TRAINING AT YALET15LM007056 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Bender Gerstein, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 1987 to 2026
$22.2M
New Kind of Quality Management for X-ray &NMR ModelsR01GM073930 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI RICHARDSON, DAVID CLAUDE · 2005 to 2013
$2.3M
Inverse Kinematics, Sterics &Data - To Fit RNA BackboneR01GM074127 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI RICHARDSON, JANE SHELBY · 2005 to 2009
$899k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-073930NIGMS NIH HHS GM-074127NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073930NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074127NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007056NLM NIH HHS T15 LM07056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A consensus classification and nomenclature are defined for RNA backbone structure using all of the backbone torsion angles. By a consensus of several independent analysis methods, 46 discrete conformers are identified as suitably clustered in a quality-filtered, multidimensional dihedral angle distribution. Most of these conformers represent identifiable features or roles within RNA structures. The conformers are given two-character names that reflect the seven-angle delta epsilon zeta alpha beta gamma delta combinations empirically found favorable for the sugar-to-sugar "suite" unit within which the angle correlations are strongest (e.g., 1a for A-form, 5z for the start of S-motifs). Since the half-nucleotides are specified by a number for delta epsilon zeta and a lowercase letter for alpha beta gamma delta, this modular system can also be parsed to describe traditional nucleotide units (e.g., a1) or the dinucleotides (e.g., a1a1) that are especially useful at the level of crystallographic map fitting. This nomenclature can also be written as a string with two-character suite names between the uppercase letters of the base sequence (N1aG1gN1aR1aA1cN1a for a GNRA tetraloop), facilitating bioinformatic comparisons. Cluster means, standard deviations, coordinates, and examples are made available, as well as the Suitename software that assigns suite conformer names and conformer match quality (suiteness) from atomic coordinates. The RNA Ontology Consortium will combine this new backbone system with others that define base pairs, base-stacking, and hydrogen-bond relationships to provide a full description of RNA structural motifs.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationComputational BiologyConsensus SequenceModels, MolecularMolecular StructureRNATerminology as TopicRNA

Identifiers

PMID18192612
PMCPMC2248255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.