Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18192192›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2008

The earliest fossil record of the animals and its significance.

Graham E Budd

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Complex Homology and the Evolution of Nervous Systems.Trends in ecology & evolution · 2016
    Review
  8. Early metazoan life: divergence, environment and ecology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  9. Molecular clocks and the early evolution of metazoan nervous systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  10. Early animal evolution and the origins of nervous systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The chromatin insulator CTCF and the emergence of metazoan diversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Graham E BuddDepartment of Earth Sciences, Palaeobiology, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, Uppsala 752 36, Sweden. graham.budd@pal.uu.se

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fossil record of the earliest animals has been enlivened in recent years by a series of spectacular discoveries, including embryos, from the Ediacaran to the Cambrian, but many issues, not least of dating and interpretation, remain controversial. In particular, aspects of taphonomy of the earliest fossils require careful consideration before pronouncements about their affinities. Nevertheless, a reasonable case can now be made for the extension of the fossil record of at least basal animals (sponges and perhaps cnidarians) to a period of time significantly before the beginning of the Cambrian. The Cambrian explosion itself still seems to represent the arrival of the bilaterians, and many new fossils in recent years have added significant data on the origin of the three major bilaterian clades. Why animals appear so late in the fossil record is still unclear, but the recent trend to embrace rising oxygen levels as being the proximate cause remains unproven and may even involve a degree of circularity.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionFossilsAnimalsModels, BiologicalOxygenPaleontologyTime FactorsOxygen

Identifiers

PMID18192192
PMCPMC2614223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.