Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18192182›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2008

The evolution of nervous system centralization.

Detlev Arendt, Alexandru S Denes, Gáspár Jékely, Kristin Tessmar-Raible

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 197 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Early nervous system development in the chaetognathFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. On growth and form of animal behavior.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Neural architecture and regeneration in the acoelProceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Detlev ArendtDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg 69117, Germany. arendt@embl.de
Alexandru S Denes
Gáspár Jékely
Kristin Tessmar-Raible
European Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEGoogle (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is yet unknown when and in what form the central nervous system in Bilateria first came into place and how it further evolved in the different bilaterian phyla. To find out, a series of recent molecular studies have compared neurodevelopment in slow-evolving deuterostome and protostome invertebrates, such as the enteropneust hemichordate Saccoglossus and the polychaete annelid Platynereis. These studies focus on the spatially different activation and, when accessible, function of genes that set up the molecular anatomy of the neuroectoderm and specify neuron types that emerge from distinct molecular coordinates. Complex similarities are detected, which reveal aspects of neurodevelopment that most likely occurred already in a similar manner in the last common ancestor of the bilaterians, Urbilateria. This way, different aspects of the molecular architecture of the urbilaterian nervous system are reconstructed and yield insight into the degree of centralization that was in place in the bilaterian ancestors.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBody PatterningCentral Nervous SystemEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalInvertebratesModels, NeurologicalVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID18192182
PMCPMC2614231
OpenAlexW2155253806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.