Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18189146›Full record

ArticleOecologia2008

Diseases and reproductive success in a wild mammal: example in the alpine chamois.

Maryline Pioz, Anne Loison, Dominique Gauthier, Philippe Gibert, Jean-Michel Jullien, Marc Artois, Emmanuelle Gilot-Fromont

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maryline PiozUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, 43 boulevard du 11 novembre 1918, Villeurbanne 69622, France.
Anne Loison
Dominique Gauthier
Philippe Gibert
Jean-Michel Jullien
Marc Artois
Emmanuelle Gilot-Fromont
Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRMinistère de l'Agriculture et de la Souveraineté alimentaire · FRTranslational Innovation in Medicine and Complexity · FRUniversité Savoie Mont Blanc · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Density-dependent and climatic factors affect reproduction and dynamics of wild ungulates. Parasites can also decrease reproductive success through either a direct abortive effect or a negative impact on host growth and body condition. However, few studies have investigated the effect of parasitism on fecundity of ungulates in natural conditions. We studied three bacterial infections caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Abortusovis, Chlamydophila abortus and Coxiella burnetii. These bacteria are leading causes of reproductive failure in sheep, goat and cattle, which raises the question of their influence on population dynamics of wild ungulates. A long-term study of demography and epidemiology of an alpine chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra, L.) population (Les Bauges Reserve, France) and a generalized linear modeling approach were used to analyze the reproductive success of chamois according to population density, weather conditions and the prevalence of antibodies against the three bacteria in females. This approach enabled us to identify the confounding effect of weather and parasitism on fecundity in a natural population. After accounting for density, the prevalence of antibodies against the three bacteria explained 36% of the annual variation in reproductive success, and weather conditions explained an additional 31%. This study was, to our knowledge, the first to compare the decrease in fecundity due to bacterial infections and weather conditions in a population of wild mountain ungulates.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsAnimals, WildAntibodies, BacterialFemaleFranceGoat DiseasesGoatsGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsLinear ModelsMalePopulation DensityPrevalenceReproductionRupicapraAntibodies, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID18189146
OpenAlexW2019016548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.