ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2008
Liver embolizations in oncology: a review. Part I. Arterial (chemo)embolizations.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical trial of cisplatin-conjugated gelatin microspheres for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Japanese journal of radiology · 2012Trial
- Magnetic Nanomaterials for Arterial Embolization and Hyperthermia of Parenchymal Organs Tumors: A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Percutaneous treatment of thoracic duct injuries.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Review
- A multidisciplinary approach to the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2010Article
- Liver abscess as a complication of hepatic transarterial chemoembolization: a case report, literature review, and clinical recommendations.Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arterial embolization of the liver often temporarily retards the growth of liver tumors which are mainly nourished arterially. The use of degradable agents avoids collateral formation which would prohibit repeat procedures and permit tumor regrowth. The effect of embolizations is largest in small hypervascular lesions, e.g., many hepatocellular or neuroendocrine cancers. Toxic chemicals can be added, chemoembolization, with unproven effects on responses and survival rates. Institutional differences in indications and procedures make evaluation of embolizations difficult. However, intermediate-term survival increases in selected cases of unresectable hepatocellular cancers and hormonal symptoms from neuroendocrine tumors often improve. Scant experience supports embolization for anti-tumoral effects in some pediatric tumors, to control bleeding from ruptured tumors, for symptomatic hemangiomas, and for downstaging of hepatocellular cancers before transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.