Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18188578›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2008

RecQ helicases: guardian angels of the DNA replication fork.

Csanád Z Bachrati, Ian D Hickson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inhibition ofFrontiers in parasitology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. RecQ Helicase Somatic Alterations in Cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. TheGenetics · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Csanád Z BachratiWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
Ian D Hickson
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the original observations made in James German's Laboratory that Bloom's syndrome cells lacking BLM exhibit a decreased rate of both DNA chain elongation and maturation of replication intermediates, a large body of evidence has supported the idea that BLM, and other members of the RecQ helicase family to which BLM belongs, play important roles in DNA replication. More recent evidence indicates roles for RecQ helicases in what can broadly be defined as replication fork 'repair' processes when, for example, forks encounter lesions or adducts in the template, or when forks stall due to lack of nucleotide precursors. More specifically, several roles in repair of damaged forks via homologous recombination pathways have been proposed. RecQ helicases are generally only recruited to sites of DNA replication following fork stalling or disruption, and they do so in a checkpoint-dependent manner. There, in addition to repair functions, they aid the stabilisation of stalled replication complexes and seem to contribute to the generation and/or transduction of signals that enforce S-phase checkpoints. RecQ helicases also interact physically and functionally with several key players in DNA replication, including RPA, PCNA, FEN1 and DNA polymerase delta. In this paper, we review the evidence that RecQ helicases contribute to the impressively high level of fidelity with which genome duplication is effected.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationAnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsHumansMutationProtein TransportRecQ HelicasesDNA-Binding ProteinsRecQ Helicases

Identifiers

PMID18188578
OpenAlexW2015078392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.