Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18188561›Full record

ReviewCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2008

Using extracellular biomarkers for monitoring efficacy of therapeutics in cancer patients: an update.

S H Beachy, E A Repasky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Circulating proteolytic signatures of chemotherapy-induced cell death in humans discovered by N-terminal labeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Silicon micro- and nanofabrication for medicine.Advanced healthcare materials · 2013
    Review
  6. Circulating immunogenic cell death biomarkers HMGB1 and RAGE in breast cancer patients during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Article
  7. Predictive value of immunogenic cell death biomarkers HMGB1, sRAGE, and DNase in liver cancer patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization therapy.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2012
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Biomarkers in T cell therapy clinical trials.Journal of translational medicine · 2011
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Circulating cytokeratin 18 fragment m65-a potential marker of malignancy in colorectal cancer patients.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2009
    Article
  14. A strategy for blood biomarker amplification and localization using ultrasound.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S H BeachyDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
E A Repasky

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapidly detectable and easily accessible markers of tumor cell death are needed for evaluating early therapeutic efficacy for immunotherapy and chemotherapy so that patients and their physicians can decide whether to remain with a given therapeutic strategy. Currently, image-based tests such as computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance imaging are used to visualize the response of a patient's tumor, but often these evaluations are not conducted for weeks to months after treatment begins. While serum levels of secreted proteins such as carcinoembryonic antigen and prostate specific antigen are commonly monitored to gauge tumor status during therapy and between image evaluations, the levels of these proteins do not always correlate well with the actual tumor response. In laboratory studies, it has been shown that tumor cells undergoing apoptosis can release cellular components into cell culture media such as cytochrome c, nucleosomes, cleaved cytokeratin-18 and E-cadherin. Studies of patient sera have found that these and other macromolecules can be found in circulation during cancer therapy, providing a potential source of material for monitoring treatment efficacy. In the future, analysis of biofluids from severe combined immunodeficiency mice bearing patient tumor specimens treated with a targeted therapy such as Apo2L/tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand will be useful in the preclinical identification of therapy response markers. In this review, the current status of the identification of serum markers of tumor cell apoptosis is provided, as well as a discussion of critical research questions that must be addressed and the considerations necessary when identifying a marker that reflects true clinical outcome.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAnimalsApoptosisCaspasesCytokinesDisease ProgressionHumansImmunotherapyLipidsMedical OncologyMiceModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsNucleosomesTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorCaspasesCytokinesLipidsNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID18188561
PMCPMC11029872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.