Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18185518›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2008

Fluconazole prophylaxis for prevention of invasive fungal infections in targeted highest risk preterm infants limits drug exposure.

J-H Weitkamp, A Ozdas, B LaFleur, A L Potts

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Safety of fluconazole in paediatrics: a systematic review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Fluconazole prophylaxis in preterm infants: a systematic review.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advances in the treatment of invasive neonatal candidiasis.Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Impact of 'targeted' fluconazole prophylaxis for preterm neonates: efficacy of a highly selective approach?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2012
    Article
  17. A review of Candida prophylaxis in the neonatal intensive care population.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J-H Weitkamp1Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN 37232-0656, USA. hendrik.weitkamp@vanderbilt.edu
A Ozdas
B LaFleur
A L Potts
Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrevious reports suggest a benefit of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants <1000 g. Our aim was to evaluate if limiting fluconazole prophylaxis to targeted highest risk infants effectively prevents invasive fungal infections, has no undesired side effects and limits unnecessary drug exposure. STUDY

designThis nonrandomized retrospective pre-post intervention study compared two groups of infants: (1) Infants <26 weeks gestation and/or <750 g birth weight, requiring central vascular access and admitted to the Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) prior to 5 days of age, who received fluconazole prophylaxis and (2) a matched control group from the year prior to prophylaxis. This target population was selected for fluconazole prophylaxis based on prior infection control data from our institution and a number needed to treat of <15 to prevent one episode of fungemia. Following implementation and integration through the institution's computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system, provider adherence to the protocol was assessed during the prophylaxis period.

resultA total of 86 patients were included in the study, 44 in the no-prophylaxis group and 42 in the prophylaxis group. In the targeted prophylaxis group, no invasive fungal infections were observed as compared to nine infants with invasive infections in the no-prophylaxis group (P=0.004). No significant adverse effects were recorded. Targeting the highest risk infants reduced the number of infants <1000 g requiring prophylaxis from 80 to 42 (48% reduction) with no preventable infection missed. Provider compliance was 91% following implementation of this protocol through the CPOE system using a standardized order set.

conclusionTargeting the highest risk infants for fluconazole prophylaxis through CPOE can effectively prevent invasive fungal infections and limit drug exposure with no unwanted side effects.

Indexed as

Infant, Very Low Birth WeightAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesMedical Order Entry SystemsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAntifungal AgentsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID18185518
OpenAlexW2164064764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.