Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18184713›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2008

Differential CD4+ versus CD8+ T-cell responses elicited by different poxvirus-based human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vaccine candidates provide comparable efficacies in primates.

Petra Mooij, Sunita S Balla-Jhagjhoorsingh, Gerrit Koopman, Niels Beenhakker, Patricia van Haaften, Ilona Baak, Ivonne G Nieuwenhuis, Ivanela Kondova, Ralf Wagner, Hans Wolf and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Defending against smallpox: a focus on vaccines.Expert review of vaccines · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Petra MooijDepartment of Virology, Biomedical Primate Research Centre (BPRC), P.O. Box 3306, 2280 GH Rijswijk, The Netherlands. mooij@bprc.nl
Sunita S Balla-Jhagjhoorsingh
Gerrit Koopman
Niels Beenhakker
Patricia van Haaften
Ilona Baak
Ivonne G Nieuwenhuis
Ivanela Kondova
Ralf Wagner
Hans Wolf
Carmen E Gómez
José L Nájera
Victoria Jiménez
Mariano Esteban
Jonathan L Heeney
Biomedical Primate Research Centre · NLCentro Nacional de Biotecnología · ESInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poxvirus vectors have proven to be highly effective for boosting immune responses in diverse vaccine settings. Recent reports reveal marked differences in the gene expression of human dendritic cells infected with two leading poxvirus-based human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine candidates, New York vaccinia virus (NYVAC) and modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA). To understand how complex genomic changes in these two vaccine vectors translate into antigen-specific systemic immune responses, we undertook a head-to-head vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy study in the pathogenic HIV type 1 (HIV-1) model of AIDS in Indian rhesus macaques. Differences in the immune responses in outbred animals were not distinguished by enzyme-linked immunospot assays, but differences were distinguished by multiparameter fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis, revealing a difference between the number of animals with both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses to vaccine inserts (MVA) and those that elicit a dominant CD4(+) T-cell response (NYVAC). Remarkably, vector-induced differences in CD4(+)/CD8(+) T-cell immune responses persisted for more than a year after challenge and even accompanied antigenic modulation throughout the control of chronic infection. Importantly, strong preexposure HIV-1/simian immunodeficiency virus-specific CD4(+) T-cell responses did not prove deleterious with respect to accelerated disease progression. In contrast, in this setting, animals with strong vaccine-induced polyfunctional CD4(+) T-cell responses showed efficacies similar to those with stronger CD8(+) T-cell responses.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHIV-1HIV AntigensImmunophenotypingMacaca mulattaPoxviridaeAIDS VaccinesHIV Antigens

Identifiers

PMID18184713
PMCPMC2258966
OpenAlexW2032640750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.