Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18184031›Full record

Trial reportDrugs & aging2008

Accuracy of telephone self-report of drug use in older people and agreement with pharmaceutical claims data.

Sabrina Winona Pit, Julie Ellen Byles, Jill Cockburn

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs & aging, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Aspirin Use and Mortality in Two Contemporary US Cohorts.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Antihypertensive Use and Recurrent Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Findings From the Health ABC Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2015
    Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabrina Winona PitSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. sabrinapit@gmail.com
Julie Ellen Byles
Jill Cockburn
University of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the agreement between two measures of medication use, namely telephone interview self-report and pharmaceutical claims data, in an elderly population.

methodsAn agreement study of 566 community-dwelling, general practice patients aged > or =65 years was conducted to compare self-reported use of medicines with pharmaceutical claims data for different retrieval periods. Classes of drugs commonly used in the elderly were selected for comparison.

results1094 people were eligible for the main study. Of these, 697 people completed a follow-up survey and 625 of these patients consented to the release of pharmaceutical claims data. A further 59 participants were excluded from the analysis because they had a home visit instead of a telephone interview. The proportion of observed agreement between the telephone self-report and the various retrieval periods was consistently high. Kappa coefficients showed good to very good agreement (> or = 0.75) with retrieval periods of 30, 60 and 90 days for benzodiazepines, low-risk NSAIDs, thiazide diuretics and most other drugs. The specificity of self-reported medication use compared with claims data was consistently high across all drug classes, suggesting that people usually did not mention drugs that were not included in the claims data. Sensitivity values varied according to drug class and retrieval period, and were lower for NSAIDs than for benzodiazepines and thiazide diuretics. Decline in sensitivity with increased retrieval periods was most marked for benzodiazepines, NSAIDs and low-risk NSAIDs, which are often used on an as-needed basis. Positive predictive values increased with longer retrieval periods

conclusionHigh agreement and accuracy were demonstrated for self-reported use of medicines when patients were interviewed over the telephone compared with pharmaceutical claims data. The telephone inventory method can be used in future studies for accurately measuring drug use in older people when claims data are not available.

Indexed as

GeriatricsInterviews as TopicSelf DisclosureAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAustraliaBenzodiazepinesHumansPharmaceutical ServicesPrevalenceRecordsReproducibility of ResultsSodium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBenzodiazepinesSodium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID18184031
OpenAlexW1972209759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.