Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18182618›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2008

The association between statins and cancer incidence in a veterans population.

Wildon R Farwell, Richard E Scranton, Elizabeth V Lawler, Robert A Lew, Mary T Brophy, Louis D Fiore, J Michael Gaziano

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 197 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. The Effect of Atorvastatin on Breast Cancer Biomarkers in High-Risk Women.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2016
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. [STE029 Overcomes EGFR-TKI Resistance in Human Lung Adenocarcinoma].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2022
    Article
  19. Innovations in Evaluating Statin Benefit and Efficacy inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wildon R FarwellMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA. wildon.farwell@va.gov
Richard E Scranton
Elizabeth V Lawler
Robert A Lew
Mary T Brophy
Louis D Fiore
J Michael Gaziano
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USVA Boston Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeta-analyses of trials of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors or statins for cardiovascular disease prevention have failed to show any statistically significant benefit of statins for cancer prevention. However, these trials included relatively young participants, who develop few cancers, and their follow-up periods may have been too short to detect an association between statin use and cancer incidence. We investigated this association in a population of veterans.

methodsWe identified patients using antihypertensive medications but no cholesterol-lowering medications (n = 25,594) and patients using statins (n = 37,248) who were enrolled in the Veterans Affairs New England Healthcare System between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2005. Age- and multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for cancer incidence, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer, among patients taking statins compared with patients taking antihypertensive medications and among patients grouped by statin dose (as equivalent simvastatin dose). All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsThe absolute incidence of total cancers was 9.4% among statin users and 13.2% among nonusers (difference = 3.8%, 95% CI = 3.3% to 4.3%, P(difference) < .001). Statin users had a statistically significant lower risk for total cancer than nonusers after adjustment for age (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.80) and multiple potential confounders (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.78). After multivariable adjustment, a statistically significantly decreased risk of all cancers was also associated with increasing statin use (P(trend) < .001).

conclusionsPatients using statins may be at lower risk for developing cancer. Additional observational studies and randomized trials of statins for cancer prevention are warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnticholesteremic AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsCohort StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIncidenceLovastatinMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasmsOdds RatioAnticholesteremic AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLovastatinPravastatinSimvastatin

Identifiers

PMID18182618
OpenAlexW2139476968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.