Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18182282›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2008

Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: the means to the end.

Tomoyuki U Tanaka, Arshad Desai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. KinetochoreDB: a comprehensive online resource for the kinetochore and its related proteins.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomoyuki U TanakaWellcome Trust Centre for Gene Regulation & Expression, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, MSI/WTB/JBC Complex, Dundee, UK. t.tanaka@lifesci.dundee.ac.uk
Arshad Desai

Funding

Kinetochore Specification and FunctionR01GM074215 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DESAI, ARSHAD · 2005 to 2025
$8.2M
Cancer Research UKNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM 074215NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074215Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kinetochores are proteinaceous complexes containing dozens of components; they are assembled at centromeric DNA regions and provide the major microtubule attachment site on chromosomes during cell division. Recent studies have defined the kinetochore components comprising the direct interface with spindle microtubules, primarily through structural and functional analysis of the Ndc80 and Dam1 complexes. These studies have facilitated our understanding of how kinetochores remain attached to the end of dynamic microtubules and how proper orientation of a kinetochore-microtubule attachment is promoted on the mitotic spindle. In this article, we review these recent studies and summarize their key findings.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansKinetochoresMicrotubulesMolecular Motor ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsNuclear ProteinsSignal TransductionMolecular Motor ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsNuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18182282
PMCPMC2358929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.