Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18181942›Full record

ReviewCell proliferation2008

Parthenotes as a source of embryonic stem cells.

T A L Brevini, F Gandolfi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell proliferation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic Manipulation of the Equine Oocyte and Embryo.Journal of equine veterinary science · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Parthenogenesis and Human Assisted Reproduction.Stem cells international · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes for cardiac repair.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Acta haematologica Polonica · 2013
    Article
  13. Parthenogenetic stem cells for tissue-engineered heart repair.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T A L BreviniLaboratory of Biomedical Embryology, Centre for Stem Cell Research, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. tiziana.brevini@unimi.it
F Gandolfi
University of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The derivation and study of human embryonic stem cell lines, despite their potential therapeutic usefulness, raise considerable ethical, religious, legal and political concerns because it inevitably leads to the destruction of viable embryos. In an attempt to bridge the division between ethical questions and potential scientific and medical benefits, considerable efforts have been devoted to the search for alternative sources of pluripotent cell lines. In this review we discuss the use of artificial parthenogenesis as a way to create entities, called parthenotes, that may represent an alternative ethical source for pluripotent cell lines. We describe the biological differences between parthenotes and embryos, in order to provide a rationale for the discussion on whether their use can be acceptable as a source of stem cells. We present data derived from animal models on the extent parthenogenetic stem cells are similar to biparental cell lines and discuss these aspects in the context of their extension to the human species. Finally, we present experiments recently carried out in our laboratory that allowed us to generate human parthenotes through artificial activation of human oocytes and to use them as a source for the derivation of parthenogenetic pluripotent cell lines.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansNuclear Transfer TechniquesOocytesParthenogenesisPluripotent Stem CellsResearch Embryo CreationStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID18181942
PMCPMC6496533
OpenAlexW1487891654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.