Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18180927›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2008

Multi-unit recording of antennal mechano-sensitive units in the central complex of the cockroach, Blaberus discoidalis.

Roy E Ritzmann, Angela L Ridgel, Alan J Pollack

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of central complex lesions on innate and learnt visual navigation in ants.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A connectome of theeLife · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Multisensory control of navigation in the fruit fly.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2020
    Review
  13. Representation of Haltere Oscillations and Integration with Visual Inputs in the Fly Central Complex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Unraveling the neural basis of insect navigation.Current opinion in insect science · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roy E RitzmannDepartment of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7080, USA. roy.ritzmann@case.edu
Angela L Ridgel
Alan J Pollack
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The central complex (CC) is a group of midline neuropils in the protocerebrum of all insects (Williams, J Zool, 176:67-86, 1975; Strausfeld, Prog Brain Res, 123:273-284, 1999). Its columnar organization coupled with the anatomical tracts to and from this region suggests that the CC may supervise various forms of locomotion. In cockroach, lesions of the CC affect turning and controlled climbing over blocks (Ridgel et al., J Comp Physiol A, 193:385-402, 2007). Since these behaviors are largely directed by tactile cues detected by antennae, we predicted that some neurons in the CC respond to mechanical antennal stimulation. We used 16-channel probes to record from broad regions within the CC, while mechanically stimulating one or the other antenna. Using cluster cutting procedures, we examined 277 units in 31 preparations. Many of these units responded to mechanical stimulation of the antennae, and of these, most responded equally well to medial or lateral stimulation of either antenna. However, several units either responded to only one antenna or responded significantly more strongly to one of them. Most of the units responding to antennal stimulation were sensitive to changes in the velocity as well as changes in light. Our data reveal a large population of mult-sensory neurons in the CC that could contribute to locomotion control.

Indexed as

LocomotionMechanotransduction, CellularAction PotentialsAnimalsCockroachesCuesFunctional LateralityNeural InhibitionNeural PathwaysNeuropilPhotic StimulationPhysical StimulationSense OrgansTime FactorsTouch

Identifiers

PMID18180927
OpenAlexW2057196920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.