Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18180912›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2008

Interindividual variability of oral sumatriptan pharmacokinetics and of clinical response in migraine patients.

Anna Ferrari, Diego Pinetti, Alfio Bertolini, Ciro Coccia, Emilio Sternieri

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Triptans: where things stand.Current treatment options in neurology · 2010
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna FerrariDivision of Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, University Centre for Adaptive Disorders and Headache, Section Modena II, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. annaf@unimore.it
Diego Pinetti
Alfio Bertolini
Ciro Coccia
Emilio Sternieri
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe marketing of sumatriptan, a selective serotonin (5-HT) 1B/1D agonist, first of the class of triptans, has increased the therapeutic options for the treatment of migraine attacks. However, almost one third of patients in clinical trials fail to have headache relief after oral administration of sumatriptan.

objectiveTo evaluate whether the interindividual differences in the clinical response following oral administration of sumatriptan are due to differences in its pharmacokinetics.

methodsWe compared the pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan after oral (100 mg) and subcutaneous (6 mg) administration in two age- and gender-matched groups: ten subjects (group A) with satisfactory response and ten (group B) with unsatisfactory response to oral sumatriptan. Patients were studied during headache-free intervals. Blood samples were taken serially from baseline to 360 min after oral administration and from baseline to 180 min after subcutaneous injection. Sumatriptan plasma concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with an electrochemical detector.

resultsFollowing oral dosing, patients of group A absorbed sumatriptan significantly faster and achieved early plasma levels significantly higher than patients of group B. The systemic exposure to sumatriptan during the first 2 h, which are the most important for rapid onset of action and for antimigraine efficacy, was significantly greater in group A than in group B (P < 0.001, Student's t test for independent data). On the other hand, after subcutaneous injection of sumatriptan, the profile of the curves was similar in all patients, and there were no differences in pharmacokinetics between group A and group B.

conclusionThe slow rate and low extent of absorption of the drug during the first 2 h after dosing observed in patients of group B could explain their unsatisfactory response to oral sumatriptan.

Indexed as

Administration, OralArea Under CurveChromatography, High Pressure LiquidFemaleHalf-LifeHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedMigraine without AuraSerotonin Receptor AgonistsSumatriptanSerotonin Receptor AgonistsSumatriptan

Identifiers

PMID18180912
OpenAlexW1984932933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.