Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2008
Interindividual variability of oral sumatriptan pharmacokinetics and of clinical response in migraine patients.
Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Theory-based analysis of clinical efficacy of triptans using receptor occupancy.The journal of headache and pain · 2014Trial
- European Headache Federation (EHF) consensus on the definition of effective treatment of a migraine attack and of triptan failure.The journal of headache and pain · 2022Review
- Evaluation of sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of oral sumatriptan in healthy Korean subjects using population pharmacokinetic modeling.Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition · 2022Article
- Polypharmacy Among Headache Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.CNS drugs · 2018Observational
- Determination of sumatriptan in human plasma using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for pharmacokinetic study in healthy Korean volunteers.Translational and clinical pharmacology · 2017Article
- Review
- Why pharmacokinetic differences among oral triptans have little clinical importance: a comment.The journal of headache and pain · 2011Review
- Triptans: where things stand.Current treatment options in neurology · 2010Article
- Multiple peaking phenomena in pharmacokinetic disposition.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2010Review
- Rationale for faster oral delivery to overcome the pathophysiology associated with dental pain--biopharmaceutic and pharmacokinetic challenges.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokineticsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe marketing of sumatriptan, a selective serotonin (5-HT) 1B/1D agonist, first of the class of triptans, has increased the therapeutic options for the treatment of migraine attacks. However, almost one third of patients in clinical trials fail to have headache relief after oral administration of sumatriptan.
objectiveTo evaluate whether the interindividual differences in the clinical response following oral administration of sumatriptan are due to differences in its pharmacokinetics.
methodsWe compared the pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan after oral (100 mg) and subcutaneous (6 mg) administration in two age- and gender-matched groups: ten subjects (group A) with satisfactory response and ten (group B) with unsatisfactory response to oral sumatriptan. Patients were studied during headache-free intervals. Blood samples were taken serially from baseline to 360 min after oral administration and from baseline to 180 min after subcutaneous injection. Sumatriptan plasma concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with an electrochemical detector.
resultsFollowing oral dosing, patients of group A absorbed sumatriptan significantly faster and achieved early plasma levels significantly higher than patients of group B. The systemic exposure to sumatriptan during the first 2 h, which are the most important for rapid onset of action and for antimigraine efficacy, was significantly greater in group A than in group B (P < 0.001, Student's t test for independent data). On the other hand, after subcutaneous injection of sumatriptan, the profile of the curves was similar in all patients, and there were no differences in pharmacokinetics between group A and group B.
conclusionThe slow rate and low extent of absorption of the drug during the first 2 h after dosing observed in patients of group B could explain their unsatisfactory response to oral sumatriptan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.