Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18180911›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2008

Early pharmacokinetics of nasal fentanyl: is there a significant arterio-venous difference?

Kristin Moksnes, Olav M Fredheim, Pål Klepstad, Stein Kaasa, Anders Angelsen, Turid Nilsen, Ola Dale

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sampling Site Has a Critical Impact on Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Intranasal Opioid Administration in Rhesus Monkeys: PET Imaging and Antinociception.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A physiologically-based recirculatory meta-model for nasal fentanyl in man.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin MoksnesDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Pain and Palliation Research Group, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, St. Olav University Hospital, Kreftbygget, 5th floor, Olav Kyrres gate 17, 7006, Trondheim, Norway. kristin.moksnes@ntnu.no
Olav M Fredheim
Pål Klepstad
Stein Kaasa
Anders Angelsen
Turid Nilsen
Ola Dale
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe have investigated the arterio-venous difference in the pharmacokinetics of 50 microg fentanyl during the first hour following nasal administration and documented its tolerability in opioid-naïve middle-aged to elderly patients.

methodsTwelve male patients (range in age 47-84 years) scheduled for transurethral resection of the prostate gland received a 100-microl dose of 50 microg fentanyl base as a fentanyl citrate formulation in one nostril. Simultaneous arterial and venous blood samples for analyses of fentanyl were drawn at baseline and at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 15, 20, 25, 35, 45 and 60 min after drug administration. Vital signs, sedation and symptoms of local irritation were recorded.

resultsThe arterial C(max) (maximum serum concentration) of 0.83 ng/ml was nearly twofold higher than the venous C(max) of 0.47 ng/ml, and the arterial T(max) (time to maximum serum concentration) of 7.0 min was about 5 min shorter than the venous T(max) of 11.6 min. The arterial AUC(0-60) (area under the curve from 0 to 60 min after administration) of 21 min*ng/ml was approximately 30% larger than the venous AUC(0-60) of 15 min*ng/ml (all p values < or = 0.005). Venous T(max) and C(max) did not predict the corresponding arterial values. No significant adverse events were observed.

conclusionA significant arterio-venous difference was present after intranasal administration of fentanyl. The short arterial T(max) complies with its rapid onset of action. The use of venous concentrations for the prediction of onset time of analgesia should be discouraged. A 50-microg dose of nasal fentanyl was well tolerated by opioid-naïve middle-aged to elderly male patients.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidArea Under CurveArteriesFentanylHumansMaleMiddle AgedUpper ExtremityVeinsAnalgesics, OpioidFentanyl

Identifiers

PMID18180911
OpenAlexW1985584449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.