ArticleMolecular psychiatry2008
A collaborative knowledge base for cognitive phenomics.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced switching and familial susceptibility for psychosis.Brain and behavior · 2018Trial
- Neurostimulation to Improve Cognitive Flexibility.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2025Article
- Neuropsychology of epilepsy surgery and theory-based practice: an opinion review.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2023Review
- Beauty and Wellness in the Semantic Memory of the Beholder.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Exploring Neural Mechanisms Related to Cognitive Control, Reward, and Affect in Eating Disorders: A Narrative Review of FMRI Studies.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2021Review
- Paradigm Shift Toward Digital Neuropsychology and High-Dimensional Neuropsychological Assessments: Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Review
- Neuropsychological tests of the future: How do we get there from here?The Clinical neuropsychologist · 2019Review
- Performance of Verbal Fluency as an Endophenotype in Patients with Familial versus Sporadic Schizophrenia and Their Parents.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- An integrative model of the maturation of cognitive control.Annual review of neuroscience · 2015Review
- Women are more sensitive than men to prior trial events on the Stop-signal task.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2014Article
- A systems neuroscience approach to the pathophysiology of pediatric mood and anxiety disorders.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2014Review
- High-throughput cognitive assessment using BrainTest.org: examining cognitive control in a family cohort.Brain and behavior · 2013Article
- Cognitive control and attentional functions.Brain and cognition · 2013Article
- Genetic architecture of declarative memory: implications for complex illnesses.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2012Review
- Executive control: balancing stability and flexibility via the duality of evolutionary neuroanatomical trends.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2012Article
- MK4MDD: a multi-level knowledge base and analysis platform for major depressive disorder.PloS one · 2012Article
- The genetics of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: a phenomic perspective.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2011Review
- The role of experimental models in developing new treatments for irritable bowel syndrome.Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2011Review
- The cognitive atlas: toward a knowledge foundation for cognitive neuroscience.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2011Article
- Neuropsychology 3.0: evidence-based science and practice.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human genome project has stimulated development of impressive repositories of biological knowledge at the genomic level and new knowledge bases are rapidly being developed in a 'bottom-up' fashion. In contrast, higher-level phenomics knowledge bases are underdeveloped, particularly with respect to the complex neuropsychiatric syndrome, symptom, cognitive, and neural systems phenotypes widely acknowledged as critical to advance molecular psychiatry research. This gap limits informatics strategies that could improve both the mining and representation of relevant knowledge, and help prioritize phenotypes for new research. Most existing structured knowledge bases also engage a limited set of contributors, and thus fail to leverage recent developments in social collaborative knowledge-building. We developed a collaborative annotation database to enable representation and sharing of empirical information about phenotypes important to neuropsychiatric research (www.Phenowiki.org). As a proof of concept, we focused on findings relevant to 'cognitive control', a neurocognitive construct considered important to multiple neuropsychiatric syndromes. Currently this knowledge base tabulates empirical findings about heritabilities and measurement properties of specific cognitive task and rating scale indicators (n=449 observations). It is hoped that this new open resource can serve as a starting point that enables broadly collaborative knowledge-building, and help investigators select and prioritize endophenotypes for translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.