Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18179723›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2008

Suicide mortality trends by sex, age and method in Taiwan, 1971-2005.

Jin-Jia Lin, Tsung-Hsueh Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Time Series Analysis of Monthly Suicide Rates in West of Iran, 2006-2013.International journal of preventive medicine · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Time trends in method-specific suicide rates in Japan, 1990-2011.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Suicide methods in Asia: implications in suicide prevention.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2012
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jin-Jia LinDepartment of Psychiatry, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan. jjl9110@ms34.hinet.net
Tsung-Hsueh Lu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethod-specific suicide trends varied across countries, and studies of the trends in different countries can contribute to the understanding of the epidemiology of suicide. The purpose of this study was to examine the changes in suicide trends by sex, age and method in the years 1971 to 2005 in Taiwan.

methodsMortality data files of suicide and undetermined deaths for the years 1971-2005 were obtained for analyses. Age-, sex- and method-specific suicide rates were calculated by four age groups (15-24, 25-44, 45-64 and 65 and above) and five suicide methods (solids/liquids poisoning, other gases poisoning, hanging, jumping, and others).

resultsBoth sexes experienced downward trends from 1971 to 1993, and then an upward trend since 1993. People aged 65 years and above had the highest suicide rates throughout the study periods. However, males aged 25-64 years experienced the steepest increasing trends. As to suicide methods, an annual increase, since 1991, of people jumping from heights to commit suicide, and a marked increase, since 1998, of people completing suicide by poisoning with other gases (mainly charcoal-burning) were observed.

conclusionSuicide by means of charcoal-burning and jumping from heights has become a serious public health problem in Taiwan. Preventive measures to curb these increasing trends are urgently needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge DistributionCause of DeathFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSex DistributionSuicideTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID18179723
PMCPMC2259336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.