Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18178646›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2008

A physical model of axonal elongation: force, viscosity, and adhesions govern the mode of outgrowth.

Matthew O'Toole, Phillip Lamoureux, Kyle E Miller

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The role of mechanics in axonal stability and development.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  4. Mathematical models of neuronal growth.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Extremely Low Forces Induce Extreme Axon Growth.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect of Cyclic Stretch on Neuron Reorientation and Axon Outgrowth.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  11. Axonal cytomechanics in neuronal development.Journal of biosciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew O'TooleDepartment of Mathematics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1115, USA.
Phillip Lamoureux
Kyle E Miller
Michigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether the axonal framework is stationary or moves is a central debate in cell biology. To better understand this problem, we developed a mathematical model that incorporates force generation at the growth cone, the viscoelastic properties of the axon, and adhesions between the axon and substrate. Using force-calibrated needles to apply and measure forces at the growth cone, we used docked mitochondria as markers to monitor movement of the axonal framework. We found coherent axonal transport that decreased away from the growth cone. Based on the velocity profiles of movement and the force applied at the growth cone, and by varying the attachment of the axonal shaft to the coverslip, we estimate values for the axial viscosity of the axon (3 x 10(6) +/- 2.4 x 10(6) Pa.s) and the friction coefficient for laminin/polyornithine-based adhesions along the axon (9.6 x 10(3) +/- 7.5 x 10(3) Pa.s). Our model suggests that whether axons elongate by tip growth or stretching depends on the level of force generation at the growth cone, the viscosity of the axon, and the level of adhesions along the axon.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAxonsCell AdhesionElasticityHumansMechanotransduction, CellularStress, MechanicalViscosity

Identifiers

PMID18178646
PMCPMC2267140
OpenAlexW2155802199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.