ReviewJournal of biology2007
Cryptic biodiversity in a changing world.
Review in Journal of biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Five Hidden Species in a Widespread European Vertebrate: Disentangling the Alpine Newt Cryptic Species Complex Through Genomic Phylogeography.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Genetic structure and haplotype analysis of predominant genetic group of Bemisia tabaci Asia II 1 from Asia and India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The effects of cryptic diversity on diversification dynamics analyses in Crocodylia.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Cryptic species conservation: a review.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Review
- To stay or to go: resource diversity alters the dispersal behavior of sympatric cryptic marine nematodes.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Article
- Biogeography of the Iranian snakes.PloS one · 2024Article
- Hybrid zone analysis confirms cryptic species of banded newt and does not support competitive displacement since secondary contact.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Genomic divergence, local adaptation, and complex demographic history may inform management of a popular sportfish species complex.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Weaving place-based knowledge for culturally significant species in the age of genomics: Looking to the past to navigate the future.Evolutionary applications · 2022Article
- Disentangling the Taxonomic Status ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Delimiting cryptic species within the brown-banded bamboo shark, Chiloscyllium punctatum in the Indo-Australian region with mitochondrial DNA and genome-wide SNP approaches.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Integrative description ofZooKeys · 2020Article
- Coexistence of two sympatric cryptic bat species in French Guiana: insights from genetic, acoustic and ecological data.BMC evolutionary biology · 2018Article
- Phylogenomic history of enigmatic pygmy perches: implications for biogeography, taxonomy and conservation.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
- The Highly Divergent Mitochondrial Genomes Indicate That the Booklouse,G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- Species boundaries in the human pathogen Paracoccidioides.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2017Article
- Article
- A landscape genetic analysis of important agricultural pest species in Tunisia: The whitefly Bemisia tabaci.PloS one · 2017Article
- Chromosomal identification of cryptic species sharing their DNA barcodes:Comparative cytogenetics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA studies are revealing the extent of hidden, or cryptic, biodiversity. Two new studies challenge paradigms about cryptic biodiversity and highlight the importance of adding a historical and biogeographic dimension to biodiversity research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.