ArticleIntensive care medicine2008
A prospective study of phrenic nerve damage after cardiac surgery in children.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is phrenic nerve-sparing worthwhile for phrenic-involved thymic epithelial tumors? A retrospective cohort study.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Tensioning diaphragmoplasty for treating bilateral phrenic nerve paralysis in a dog.The Journal of small animal practice · 2025Article
- Outcome analysis of a conservative approach to diaphragmatic paralysis following congenital cardiac surgery in neonates and infants: a bicentric retrospective study.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2021Article
- Significant diaphragm elevation suggestive of phrenic nerve injury after thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer: an underestimated problem.Translational lung cancer research · 2020Article
- Bilateral Diaphragmatic Paralysis Following Paediatric Cardiac Surgery: Experience of four cases at the Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2017Article
- Suspected bilateral phrenic nerve damage following a mediastinal mass removal in a 17-week-old pug.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2017Article
- Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine, 2008: III. Paediatrics, ethics, outcome research and critical care organization, sedation, pharmacology and miscellanea.Intensive care medicine · 2009Review
- Early diagnosis of diaphragm palsy after pediatric cardiac surgery and outcome after diaphragm plication - A single-center experience.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo gather detailed data on the incidence of phrenic nerve damage (PND) following cardiac surgery in children, the risk factors for its development, its effect on morbidity and its prognosis.
designProspective electrophysiological measurement of phrenic nerve latency in 310 children before and after cardiac surgery.
settingTertiary paediatric cardiac surgical centre. MEASUREMENTS AND
resultsOur findings were fourfold. Firstly, the incidence of PND in our group of patients was 20%, significantly higher than estimates using indirect methods of assessment. Secondly, PND increased the duration of ventilation by a median of 76 h (20 vs. 96 h; p<0.001), and late post-operative deaths (before hospital discharge) occurred in 12.9% of patients compared to 2.4% among patients with a normal post-operative phrenic latency. Thirdly, the risk factors that were independently predictive of the development of PND were the site of the surgery and the patient's age. Patients who required surgery at both the lung hilum and the pericardium were more likely to develop PND than patients with only one of those sites, or when neither was involved, and children less than 18 months old were more likely to develop PND than older children. Lastly, the natural history of PND following surgery appears to be good. In our follow-up to 3 months, approximately one third recovered within 1 month and a further third (overall) recovered by 3 months.
conclusionsWe conclude that the incidence of PND is much higher than currently recognised, and has a very significant effect on post-operative morbidity and mortality. Most children who survive the post-operative period will recover nerve function within 3 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.