Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18176797›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2008

A prospective study of phrenic nerve damage after cardiac surgery in children.

Robert I Ross Russell, Peter J Helms, Martin J Elliott

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Suspected bilateral phrenic nerve damage following a mediastinal mass removal in a 17-week-old pug.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2017
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert I Ross RussellDepartment of Paediatrics, Box 181, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, CB2 2QQ, Cambridge, UK. robert.ross-russell@addenbrookes.nhs.uk
Peter J Helms
Martin J Elliott
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Hospital for Children · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo gather detailed data on the incidence of phrenic nerve damage (PND) following cardiac surgery in children, the risk factors for its development, its effect on morbidity and its prognosis.

designProspective electrophysiological measurement of phrenic nerve latency in 310 children before and after cardiac surgery.

settingTertiary paediatric cardiac surgical centre. MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsOur findings were fourfold. Firstly, the incidence of PND in our group of patients was 20%, significantly higher than estimates using indirect methods of assessment. Secondly, PND increased the duration of ventilation by a median of 76 h (20 vs. 96 h; p<0.001), and late post-operative deaths (before hospital discharge) occurred in 12.9% of patients compared to 2.4% among patients with a normal post-operative phrenic latency. Thirdly, the risk factors that were independently predictive of the development of PND were the site of the surgery and the patient's age. Patients who required surgery at both the lung hilum and the pericardium were more likely to develop PND than patients with only one of those sites, or when neither was involved, and children less than 18 months old were more likely to develop PND than older children. Lastly, the natural history of PND following surgery appears to be good. In our follow-up to 3 months, approximately one third recovered within 1 month and a further third (overall) recovered by 3 months.

conclusionsWe conclude that the incidence of PND is much higher than currently recognised, and has a very significant effect on post-operative morbidity and mortality. Most children who survive the post-operative period will recover nerve function within 3 months.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsMalePeripheral Nervous System DiseasesPhrenic NervePrognosisProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID18176797
OpenAlexW1966232875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.