Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18174295›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2008

Genetic classification and distinguishing of Staphylococcus species based on different partial gap, 16S rRNA, hsp60, rpoB, sodA, and tuf gene sequences.

B Ghebremedhin, F Layer, W König, B König

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. ThreeViruses · 2026
    Article
  4. Shallow metagenomic shotgun sequencing improves detection of pathogenic species in cystic fibrosis respiratory samples.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Humanized Mouse Models of Bacterial Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Phylogenetic analysis ofOpen veterinary journal · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Safety and Technological Characterization ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B GhebremedhinOtto-von-Guericke University, Clinical Microbiology, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg, Germany. beniam.ghebremedhin@med.ovgu.de
F Layer
W König
B König

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences has been the technique generally used to study the evolution and taxonomy of staphylococci. However, the results of this method do not correspond to the results of polyphasic taxonomy, and the related species cannot always be distinguished from each other. Thus, new phylogenetic markers for Staphylococcus spp. are needed. We partially sequenced the gap gene (approximately 931 bp), which encodes the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, for 27 Staphylococcus species. The partial sequences had 24.3 to 96% interspecies homology and were useful in the identification of staphylococcal species (F. Layer, B. Ghebremedhin, W. König, and B. König, J. Microbiol. Methods 70:542-549, 2007). The DNA sequence similarities of the partial staphylococcal gap sequences were found to be lower than those of 16S rRNA (approximately 97%), rpoB (approximately 86%), hsp60 (approximately 82%), and sodA (approximately 78%). Phylogenetically derived trees revealed four statistically supported groups: S. hyicus/S. intermedius, S. sciuri, S. haemolyticus/S. simulans, and S. aureus/epidermidis. The branching of S. auricularis, S. cohnii subsp. cohnii, and the heterogeneous S. saprophyticus group, comprising S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus and S. equorum subsp. equorum, was not reliable. Thus, the phylogenetic analysis based on the gap gene sequences revealed similarities between the dendrograms based on other gene sequences (e.g., the S. hyicus/S. intermedius and S. sciuri groups) as well as differences, e.g., the grouping of S. arlettae and S. kloosii in the gap-based tree. From our results, we propose the partial sequencing of the gap gene as an alternative molecular tool for the taxonomical analysis of Staphylococcus species and for decreasing the possibility of misidentification.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesSequence Analysis, DNABacterial ProteinsChaperonin 60DNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesGenes, rRNAGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate DehydrogenasesHumansMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpecies SpecificityStaphylococcusSuperoxide DismutaseBacterial ProteinsChaperonin 60DNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate DehydrogenasesRNA polymerase beta subunitRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSodA protein, BacteriaSuperoxide Dismutase

Identifiers

PMID18174295
PMCPMC2268370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.